Dynamics of Antibody Binding and Neutralization during Viral Infection.

IF 2 4区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Zhenying Chen, Hasan Ahmed, Cora Hirst, Rustom Antia
{"title":"Dynamics of Antibody Binding and Neutralization during Viral Infection.","authors":"Zhenying Chen, Hasan Ahmed, Cora Hirst, Rustom Antia","doi":"10.1007/s11538-024-01373-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo in infection, virions are constantly produced and die rapidly. In contrast, most antibody binding assays do not include such features. Motivated by this, we considered virions with n = 100 binding sites in simple mathematical models with and without the production of virions. In the absence of viral production, at steady state, the distribution of virions by the number of sites bound is given by a binomial distribution, with the proportion being a simple function of antibody affinity (K<sub>on</sub>/K<sub>off</sub>) and concentration; this generalizes to a multinomial distribution in the case of two or more kinds of antibodies. In the presence of viral production, the role of affinity is replaced by an infection analog of affinity (IAA), with IAA = K<sub>on</sub>/(K<sub>off</sub> + d<sub>v</sub> + r), where d<sub>v</sub> is the virus decay rate and r is the infection growth rate. Because in vivo d<sub>v</sub> can be large, the amount of binding as well as the effect of K<sub>off</sub> on binding are substantially reduced. When neutralization is added, the effect of K<sub>off</sub> is similarly small which may help explain the relatively high K<sub>off</sub> reported for many antibodies. We next show that the n+2-dimensional model used for neutralization can be simplified to a 2-dimensional model. This provides some justification for the simple models that have been used in practice. A corollary of our results is that an unexpectedly large effect of K<sub>off</sub> in vivo may point to mechanisms of neutralization beyond stoichiometry. Our results suggest reporting K<sub>on</sub> and K<sub>off</sub> separately, rather than focusing on affinity, until the situation is better resolved both experimentally and theoretically.</p>","PeriodicalId":9372,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","volume":"87 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01373-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vivo in infection, virions are constantly produced and die rapidly. In contrast, most antibody binding assays do not include such features. Motivated by this, we considered virions with n = 100 binding sites in simple mathematical models with and without the production of virions. In the absence of viral production, at steady state, the distribution of virions by the number of sites bound is given by a binomial distribution, with the proportion being a simple function of antibody affinity (Kon/Koff) and concentration; this generalizes to a multinomial distribution in the case of two or more kinds of antibodies. In the presence of viral production, the role of affinity is replaced by an infection analog of affinity (IAA), with IAA = Kon/(Koff + dv + r), where dv is the virus decay rate and r is the infection growth rate. Because in vivo dv can be large, the amount of binding as well as the effect of Koff on binding are substantially reduced. When neutralization is added, the effect of Koff is similarly small which may help explain the relatively high Koff reported for many antibodies. We next show that the n+2-dimensional model used for neutralization can be simplified to a 2-dimensional model. This provides some justification for the simple models that have been used in practice. A corollary of our results is that an unexpectedly large effect of Koff in vivo may point to mechanisms of neutralization beyond stoichiometry. Our results suggest reporting Kon and Koff separately, rather than focusing on affinity, until the situation is better resolved both experimentally and theoretically.

病毒感染过程中抗体结合和中和的动态变化。
在体内感染中,病毒粒子不断产生并迅速死亡。相比之下,大多数抗体结合试验不包括这些特征。受此启发,我们在简单的数学模型中考虑了n = 100个结合位点的病毒粒子,无论是否产生病毒粒子。在不产生病毒的情况下,在稳定状态下,病毒粒子通过结合位点的数量分布为二项分布,其比例是抗体亲和力(Kon/Koff)和浓度的简单函数;在两种或两种以上抗体的情况下,这推广到多项分布。在病毒产生的情况下,亲和力的作用被亲和力的感染类似物(IAA)所取代,IAA = Kon/(Koff + dv + r),其中dv为病毒衰变速率,r为感染生长速率。由于体内dv可以很大,因此结合量以及Koff对结合的影响都大大降低。当加入中和作用时,Koff效应同样很小,这可能有助于解释许多抗体报告的相对较高的Koff。接下来,我们证明了用于中和的n+2维模型可以简化为2维模型。这为在实践中使用的简单模型提供了一些理由。我们的结果的一个推论是,一个意想不到的大效应的科夫在体内可能指向机制的中和超越化学计量。我们的研究结果表明,在实验和理论上更好地解决这种情况之前,分别报告Kon和Koff,而不是关注亲和力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, the official journal of the Society for Mathematical Biology, disseminates original research findings and other information relevant to the interface of biology and the mathematical sciences. Contributions should have relevance to both fields. In order to accommodate the broad scope of new developments, the journal accepts a variety of contributions, including: Original research articles focused on new biological insights gained with the help of tools from the mathematical sciences or new mathematical tools and methods with demonstrated applicability to biological investigations Research in mathematical biology education Reviews Commentaries Perspectives, and contributions that discuss issues important to the profession All contributions are peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信