Test and retest reliability of objective screening tests in neonatal hearing screening program in developing countries.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Meghana Mohan B, Chandni Jain
{"title":"Test and retest reliability of objective screening tests in neonatal hearing screening program in developing countries.","authors":"Meghana Mohan B, Chandni Jain","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09085-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aimed to assess the reliability of screening tests in healthy newborns across diverse hospital environments and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants hospitalized for over 5 days, particularly within the framework of hearing screening in developing countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study comprised 100 neonates in each group: G1 (healthy infants in government general wards), G2 (healthy infants in private special wards), and G3 (infants in NICU for over 5 days). Intra-session (within 5 min) and inter-session (within a month) otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR) recordings were conducted and the reliability of each test was evaluated across sessions and groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted Kappa results showed poor within-session reliability of OAEs in G1 and G3, while G2 exhibited good reliability. AABR intra-session reliability was consistently good across all three groups. The inter-session reliability of OAEs remained poor in G1 and G3 but better in G2. Significantly, the inter-session reliability for AABR decreased in G1 and G3, with Chi-square analysis revealing a notable referral discrepancy between the initial and final assessments. Such a disparity was absent in G2, where reliability remained high.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study highlights the compromised reliability of OAEs in noisy environments, while AABR maintains good reliability under similar conditions. Additionally, AABR shows poorer reliability when conducted within a specific early timeframe, emphasizing the importance of screening after this period. This issue does not affect OAE, but OAE is limited in detecting mild conductive components. The study highlights the poor reliability of AABRs in the NICU group, attributing this to the potential for improved thresholds over time within this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"1843-1851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09085-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study aimed to assess the reliability of screening tests in healthy newborns across diverse hospital environments and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants hospitalized for over 5 days, particularly within the framework of hearing screening in developing countries.

Method: The study comprised 100 neonates in each group: G1 (healthy infants in government general wards), G2 (healthy infants in private special wards), and G3 (infants in NICU for over 5 days). Intra-session (within 5 min) and inter-session (within a month) otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR) recordings were conducted and the reliability of each test was evaluated across sessions and groups.

Results: The weighted Kappa results showed poor within-session reliability of OAEs in G1 and G3, while G2 exhibited good reliability. AABR intra-session reliability was consistently good across all three groups. The inter-session reliability of OAEs remained poor in G1 and G3 but better in G2. Significantly, the inter-session reliability for AABR decreased in G1 and G3, with Chi-square analysis revealing a notable referral discrepancy between the initial and final assessments. Such a disparity was absent in G2, where reliability remained high.

Discussion: The study highlights the compromised reliability of OAEs in noisy environments, while AABR maintains good reliability under similar conditions. Additionally, AABR shows poorer reliability when conducted within a specific early timeframe, emphasizing the importance of screening after this period. This issue does not affect OAE, but OAE is limited in detecting mild conductive components. The study highlights the poor reliability of AABRs in the NICU group, attributing this to the potential for improved thresholds over time within this group.

发展中国家新生儿听力筛查项目中客观筛查试验的测试和再测试可靠性。
背景:本研究旨在评估不同医院环境下健康新生儿和住院5天以上新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)婴儿筛查试验的可靠性,特别是在发展中国家听力筛查的框架内。方法:每组100例新生儿:G1(政府普通病房健康婴儿),G2(私立专科病房健康婴儿),G3 (NICU 5 d以上婴儿)。进行疗程内(5分钟内)和疗程间(一个月内)耳声发射(OAE)和自动听觉脑干反应(AABR)记录,并评估每个测试在疗程和组间的可靠性。结果:加权Kappa结果显示G1和G3的会话内信度较差,而G2的会话内信度较好。在所有三组中,AABR的会话内可靠性一直很好。oae的会话间可靠性在G1和G3组较差,而在G2组较好。值得注意的是,在G1和G3中,AABR的会话间可靠性下降,卡方分析显示初始评估和最终评估之间存在显着的转诊差异。在可靠性仍然很高的G2中没有这种差异。讨论:该研究强调了噪声环境下oae的可靠性受损,而AABR在类似条件下保持良好的可靠性。此外,在特定的早期时间范围内进行AABR显示出较差的可靠性,强调了在此期间之后进行筛查的重要性。这个问题不影响OAE,但OAE在检测轻度导电元件方面受到限制。该研究强调了新生儿重症监护组aabr的可靠性较差,并将其归因于该组随着时间的推移阈值可能有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信