Application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xiaoyun Wu, Suming Cao, Siyu Qin
{"title":"Application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.","authors":"Xiaoyun Wu, Suming Cao, Siyu Qin","doi":"10.1186/s12938-024-01303-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on the clinical data of 120 patients with hepatolithiasis who were admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in our hospital between December 2017 and May 2022 using convenience sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were differences in the impact of different management modes on blood glucose and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the two groups of patients (F<sub>blood glucose</sub> = 32.581, F<sub>VAS</sub> = 41.472, all P < 0.001). The average blood glucose levels in the traditional group were higher than those in the ERAS group at two time points, and the VAS scores in the former group were higher than those in the latter at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. The remifentanil dosage (49.89 ± 12.12 vs 57.84 ± 11.43 mL, t = - 2.475, P = 0.016), patient-controlled analgesia frequency (3.83 ± 2.23 vs 5.57 ± 3.52 times, t = - 2.481, P = 0.015) and analgesic supplementation frequency (0.57 ± 0.73 vs 1.07 ± 1.02 times, t = - 2.653, P = 0.010) in the ERAS group were all lower than those in the traditional group. Different management modes had different effects on the levels of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) in the two groups of patients (F<sub>PCT</sub> = 45.371, F<sub>IL-6</sub> = 43.466, F<sub>CRP</sub> = 51.364, F<sub>WBC</sub> = 65.674, all P < 0.001). The levels of PCT, IL-6, CRP and WBC in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group at three time points: postoperative day 1, 7 and 14. The postoperative hospital stay (8.41 ± 2.55 vs 11.61 ± 3.34 d, t = - 7.812, P < 0.001) and proportion of postoperative complications (9.61% vs 26.47%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.403, P = 0.020) in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of ERAS effectively reduces the perioperative stress response, shortens the postoperative length of hospital stay and lowers the overall incidence of postoperative complications in patients with hepatolithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"23 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01303-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy.

Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on the clinical data of 120 patients with hepatolithiasis who were admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in our hospital between December 2017 and May 2022 using convenience sampling.

Results: There were differences in the impact of different management modes on blood glucose and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the two groups of patients (Fblood glucose = 32.581, FVAS = 41.472, all P < 0.001). The average blood glucose levels in the traditional group were higher than those in the ERAS group at two time points, and the VAS scores in the former group were higher than those in the latter at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. The remifentanil dosage (49.89 ± 12.12 vs 57.84 ± 11.43 mL, t = - 2.475, P = 0.016), patient-controlled analgesia frequency (3.83 ± 2.23 vs 5.57 ± 3.52 times, t = - 2.481, P = 0.015) and analgesic supplementation frequency (0.57 ± 0.73 vs 1.07 ± 1.02 times, t = - 2.653, P = 0.010) in the ERAS group were all lower than those in the traditional group. Different management modes had different effects on the levels of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) in the two groups of patients (FPCT = 45.371, FIL-6 = 43.466, FCRP = 51.364, FWBC = 65.674, all P < 0.001). The levels of PCT, IL-6, CRP and WBC in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group at three time points: postoperative day 1, 7 and 14. The postoperative hospital stay (8.41 ± 2.55 vs 11.61 ± 3.34 d, t = - 7.812, P < 0.001) and proportion of postoperative complications (9.61% vs 26.47%, χ2 = 5.403, P = 0.020) in the ERAS group were lower than those in the traditional group.

Conclusion: The application of ERAS effectively reduces the perioperative stress response, shortens the postoperative length of hospital stay and lowers the overall incidence of postoperative complications in patients with hepatolithiasis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信