Areas of improvement for colorectal cancer screening: Results of a screening initiative for 10,000 health care employees in Austria.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2462-0466
Julian Prosenz, Zoe Anne Österreicher, Florian Koutny, Arno Asaturi, Moira Birkl, Rosanna Hanke, Monika Ferlitsch, Andreas Maieron
{"title":"Areas of improvement for colorectal cancer screening: Results of a screening initiative for 10,000 health care employees in Austria.","authors":"Julian Prosenz, Zoe Anne Österreicher, Florian Koutny, Arno Asaturi, Moira Birkl, Rosanna Hanke, Monika Ferlitsch, Andreas Maieron","doi":"10.1055/a-2462-0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Participation in and quality of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening varies greatly and it is unclear how much of CRC screening guideline quality metrics reach patients. The aims of this prospective observational study were to provide data from everyday practice in Austria. <b>Patients and methods</b> All employees aged ≥ 50 years were invited and received a stool-based-test (FIT (cut-off 25 mcg Hb/g) and M2PK), which could be dropped off at the workplace. All individuals with positive tests were called and offered a colonoscopy near their workplace/home in ≤ 3 weeks performed by unselected endoscopists. Non-attendees received email and telephone reminders. <b>Results</b> Of 10,239 eligible employees (2706 males, 7533 females), 2390 (23%) (plus 673 < 50 years) median age 53 (interquartile range 50;56) participated in the stool-based screening (18% males, 25% females). Of 3063 tests, 747 (24%) were positive. The follow-up rate for 616 individuals who accepted or eventually underwent colonoscopy was 84% (n = 517). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 20.5% (31% in men, 17% in women) and varied substantially, ranging from 15% in hospitals (excluding the study center) to 18.5% among office-based endoscopists, and up to 36% in the study center. Most European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-recommended performance indicators were unmet, including the polyp detection rate (PDR), ADR, reporting of polyp characteristics, and bowel preparation adequacy. <b>Conclusions</b> There is a serious gap between recommended standards and real-world CRC screening colonoscopy quality. Implementation of CRC screening should not only be accompanied by strategies to increase participation rates but focus on implementation of rigorous, mandatory colonoscopy quality assurance programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"E1425-E1433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2462-0466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Participation in and quality of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening varies greatly and it is unclear how much of CRC screening guideline quality metrics reach patients. The aims of this prospective observational study were to provide data from everyday practice in Austria. Patients and methods All employees aged ≥ 50 years were invited and received a stool-based-test (FIT (cut-off 25 mcg Hb/g) and M2PK), which could be dropped off at the workplace. All individuals with positive tests were called and offered a colonoscopy near their workplace/home in ≤ 3 weeks performed by unselected endoscopists. Non-attendees received email and telephone reminders. Results Of 10,239 eligible employees (2706 males, 7533 females), 2390 (23%) (plus 673 < 50 years) median age 53 (interquartile range 50;56) participated in the stool-based screening (18% males, 25% females). Of 3063 tests, 747 (24%) were positive. The follow-up rate for 616 individuals who accepted or eventually underwent colonoscopy was 84% (n = 517). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 20.5% (31% in men, 17% in women) and varied substantially, ranging from 15% in hospitals (excluding the study center) to 18.5% among office-based endoscopists, and up to 36% in the study center. Most European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-recommended performance indicators were unmet, including the polyp detection rate (PDR), ADR, reporting of polyp characteristics, and bowel preparation adequacy. Conclusions There is a serious gap between recommended standards and real-world CRC screening colonoscopy quality. Implementation of CRC screening should not only be accompanied by strategies to increase participation rates but focus on implementation of rigorous, mandatory colonoscopy quality assurance programs.

结直肠癌筛查方面有待改进的领域:奥地利1万名保健工作人员筛查倡议的结果。
结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的参与程度和质量差异很大,目前尚不清楚患者对CRC筛查指南质量指标的了解程度。这项前瞻性观察性研究的目的是提供奥地利日常实践的数据。患者和方法所有年龄≥50岁的员工被邀请并接受基于粪便的测试(FIT(临界值为25 mcg Hb/g)和M2PK),这些测试可以在工作场所丢弃。所有检测结果呈阳性的个体被召集,并在≤3周内由未选择的内窥镜医师在其工作场所/家附近进行结肠镜检查。非与会者收到了电子邮件和电话提醒。结果10239名符合条件的员工(男性2706名,女性7533名)中,2390名(23%)(加上673名< 50岁)(四分位数范围50;56)参加了基于粪便的筛查(男性18%,女性25%)。在3063例试验中,747例(24%)呈阳性。接受或最终接受结肠镜检查的616人的随访率为84% (n = 517)。腺瘤检出率(ADR)为20.5%(男性为31%,女性为17%),差异很大,从医院(不包括研究中心)的15%到办公室内窥镜医师的18.5%,在研究中心高达36%。大多数欧洲胃肠内镜学会推荐的性能指标未达到,包括息肉检出率(PDR)、不良反应、息肉特征报告和肠道准备充分性。结论推荐标准与实际结直肠癌结肠镜筛查质量存在较大差距。实施结直肠癌筛查不仅应伴随着提高参与率的策略,而且应侧重于实施严格的强制性结肠镜检查质量保证计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信