Association Between Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Mortality Among US Adults: Prospective Cohort Study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2008.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Lu Wang, Euridice Martínez Steele, Mengxi Du, Hanqi Luo, Xuehong Zhang, Dariush Mozaffarian, Fang Fang Zhang
{"title":"Association Between Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Mortality Among US Adults: Prospective Cohort Study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2008.","authors":"Lu Wang, Euridice Martínez Steele, Mengxi Du, Hanqi Luo, Xuehong Zhang, Dariush Mozaffarian, Fang Fang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPF) provides more than half of the daily energy US adults consume. Still, the prospective association of UPF consumption with mortality in the general US population remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prospective association of UPF consumption with mortality in a nationally representative sample of US adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort analysis was conducted by linking baseline measurement from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with mortality information from the National Death Index. The percentage of total energy consumed from UPF, defined by the Nova classification system, was computed based on dietary data collected using 24-hour diet recalls.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>This study included 38 148 nationally representative US adults aged 20 years and older who participated in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2003-2004 and 2017-2018 and provided dietary intake data, with linkage to mortality data.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Information on all-cause and cause-specific mortality was obtained from linkage to the National Death Index through December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis performed: </strong>Cox proportional hazard models estimated the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs for the association between UPF intake and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 4611 deaths were confirmed, including 2064 deaths from cardiometabolic disorders and 1046 deaths from cancer. After multivariable adjustments, each 10-point increment in usual percentage of total energy from UPF was associated with a 9% higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.14). The association remained significant after adjusting for the overall diet quality measured by the Health Eating Index 2015 (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; P < .05). Among subgroups, sugar-sweetened beverages, ready-to-eat or -heat mixed dishes, ultraprocessed dairy products, and ultraprocessed oil/fat, condiments, and sauces were associated with an increased risk of all-cause or cause-specific mortality. Ultraprocessed vegetables and legumes were associated with a reduced risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this nationally representative study of US adults, higher consumption of UPF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, and this association was not fully explained by overall diet quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPF) provides more than half of the daily energy US adults consume. Still, the prospective association of UPF consumption with mortality in the general US population remains understudied.

Objective: To investigate the prospective association of UPF consumption with mortality in a nationally representative sample of US adults.

Design: A prospective cohort analysis was conducted by linking baseline measurement from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with mortality information from the National Death Index. The percentage of total energy consumed from UPF, defined by the Nova classification system, was computed based on dietary data collected using 24-hour diet recalls.

Participants/setting: This study included 38 148 nationally representative US adults aged 20 years and older who participated in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2003-2004 and 2017-2018 and provided dietary intake data, with linkage to mortality data.

Main outcome measures: Information on all-cause and cause-specific mortality was obtained from linkage to the National Death Index through December 31, 2019.

Statistical analysis performed: Cox proportional hazard models estimated the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs for the association between UPF intake and mortality.

Results: During a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 4611 deaths were confirmed, including 2064 deaths from cardiometabolic disorders and 1046 deaths from cancer. After multivariable adjustments, each 10-point increment in usual percentage of total energy from UPF was associated with a 9% higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.14). The association remained significant after adjusting for the overall diet quality measured by the Health Eating Index 2015 (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; P < .05). Among subgroups, sugar-sweetened beverages, ready-to-eat or -heat mixed dishes, ultraprocessed dairy products, and ultraprocessed oil/fat, condiments, and sauces were associated with an increased risk of all-cause or cause-specific mortality. Ultraprocessed vegetables and legumes were associated with a reduced risk.

Conclusions: In this nationally representative study of US adults, higher consumption of UPF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, and this association was not fully explained by overall diet quality.

美国成年人超加工食品消费与死亡率之间的关系:2003-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查的前瞻性队列研究
背景:超加工食品的摄入量提供了美国成年人每天消耗的一半以上的能量。尽管如此,超加工食品消费与美国普通人群死亡率之间的潜在联系仍未得到充分研究。目的:调查超加工食品消费与美国成年人死亡率的潜在关联。设计:通过将国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的基线测量与国家死亡指数的死亡率信息联系起来,进行前瞻性队列分析。由Nova分类系统定义的超加工食品消耗的总能量百分比(%E)是根据24小时饮食召回收集的饮食数据计算的。参与者/环境:本研究包括38148名具有全国代表性的20岁及以上的美国成年人,他们在2003-2004年至2017-2018年期间参加了NHANES,并提供了与死亡率数据相关的饮食摄入量数据。主要结局指标:通过与截至2019年12月31日的国家死亡指数的联系,获得了全因和特定原因死亡率的信息。进行统计分析:Cox比例风险模型估计了超加工食品摄入与死亡率之间的多变量调整风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在中位随访8.0年期间,确认有4611人死亡,其中2064人死于心脏代谢疾病(CMD), 1046人死于癌症。在多变量调整后,超加工食品中通常%E每增加10个点,全因死亡率风险就会增加9% (HR=1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.14)。在调整了2015年健康饮食指数测量的整体饮食质量后,这种关联仍然显著(HR=1.06, 95% CI, 1.00-1.11, p)。结论:在这项具有全国代表性的美国成年人研究中,超加工食品的摄入量越高,全因死亡率风险越高,这种关联并不能完全用整体饮食质量来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信