Social capital as a catalyst for gender inequality: A scoping review of networking disparities in academic medicine

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35667
Jacquelyn K. Callander MD, Daniel E. Johnson PhD, Jennifer R. Grandis MD
{"title":"Social capital as a catalyst for gender inequality: A scoping review of networking disparities in academic medicine","authors":"Jacquelyn K. Callander MD,&nbsp;Daniel E. Johnson PhD,&nbsp;Jennifer R. Grandis MD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gender disparities in academic medicine persist despite gender parity among medical school graduates. Women remain underrepresented in higher academic ranks and leadership roles, with significant differences in retention, promotion, and compensation. In this scoping review, the authors explore the role of networking and social capital in exacerbating these disparities. The literature reviewed highlights the importance of networking in obtaining leadership roles, decreasing social isolation, and enhancing retention. Sponsorship, distinct from mentorship, is vital for career development and has a direct impact on professional growth. However, women are often under-sponsored compared with men, limiting their access to influential networks. In addition, virtual networking platforms and women-focused organizations offer promising alternatives to traditional, male-dominated networking activities. Despite the progress made, informal networking practices and gender biases continue to exclude women from key opportunities. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions aimed at enhancing the social capital of women in academic medicine to help close the gender gap. Proposed interventions prime for further evaluation include the implementation of formal sponsorship programs, the development of structured networking opportunities, and the promotion of women-focused organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender disparities in academic medicine persist despite gender parity among medical school graduates. Women remain underrepresented in higher academic ranks and leadership roles, with significant differences in retention, promotion, and compensation. In this scoping review, the authors explore the role of networking and social capital in exacerbating these disparities. The literature reviewed highlights the importance of networking in obtaining leadership roles, decreasing social isolation, and enhancing retention. Sponsorship, distinct from mentorship, is vital for career development and has a direct impact on professional growth. However, women are often under-sponsored compared with men, limiting their access to influential networks. In addition, virtual networking platforms and women-focused organizations offer promising alternatives to traditional, male-dominated networking activities. Despite the progress made, informal networking practices and gender biases continue to exclude women from key opportunities. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions aimed at enhancing the social capital of women in academic medicine to help close the gender gap. Proposed interventions prime for further evaluation include the implementation of formal sponsorship programs, the development of structured networking opportunities, and the promotion of women-focused organizations.

社会资本作为性别不平等的催化剂:学术医学网络差异的范围审查。
尽管医学院毕业生性别平等,但学术医学领域的性别差异仍然存在。女性在更高的学术职位和领导角色中所占比例仍然不足,在保留、晋升和薪酬方面存在显著差异。在这篇范围审查中,作者探讨了网络和社会资本在加剧这些差异中的作用。文献综述强调了网络在获得领导角色、减少社会孤立和提高保留率方面的重要性。与导师不同,赞助对职业发展至关重要,对专业成长有直接影响。然而,与男性相比,女性往往得不到足够的资助,这限制了她们进入有影响力的网络。此外,虚拟网络平台和以女性为中心的组织为传统的男性主导的网络活动提供了有希望的替代方案。尽管取得了进展,但非正式的网络做法和性别偏见继续将妇女排除在关键机会之外。这些发现强调需要有针对性的干预措施,旨在提高妇女在学术医学中的社会资本,以帮助缩小性别差距。有待进一步评估的建议干预措施包括实施正式的赞助计划,发展结构化的网络机会,以及促进以妇女为中心的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信