The efficacy and costing of termite (Blattodea: Termitoidae) survey methods in Australian tropical savannas

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Ellen Rochelmeyer, Anna E. Richards, Brett P. Murphy, Shaun Levick, Alyson M. Stobo-Wilson, Theo Evans
{"title":"The efficacy and costing of termite (Blattodea: Termitoidae) survey methods in Australian tropical savannas","authors":"Ellen Rochelmeyer,&nbsp;Anna E. Richards,&nbsp;Brett P. Murphy,&nbsp;Shaun Levick,&nbsp;Alyson M. Stobo-Wilson,&nbsp;Theo Evans","doi":"10.1111/aen.12711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Termites are important ecosystem engineers in many ecosystems globally. Hence, surveys of termite species composition, abundance and activity can be important for understanding ecosystem function—especially in biomes where they tend to be abundant, such as tropical savannas. However, comprehensively surveying termites can be challenging due to their cryptic nature and varied feeding and nesting habits, which strongly influence the effectiveness of different survey methods. Baiting and active searches of reduced transects are two methods commonly used to sample termites, and while these methods have been evaluated in the savannas of South Africa, this has not occurred in the extensive tropical savannas of northern Australia. Thus, this study evaluated the effectiveness of baits and reduced transects to assess termite species richness and activity across 18 × 1 ha experimental plots in a tropical savanna near Darwin, Australia. Surveys in each plot consisted of two 60 × 2 m transects and a 9 × 3 baiting grid of alternating buried wood and paper baits and surface straw baits. Baits were checked three times: at 4-, 7- and 10-week intervals following placement. Upon survey completion, the sampling effort, efficacy and costs of each method were compared. Reduced transects detected all 32 species recorded in this study, representing four feeding groups (from undecayed wood to highly decayed organic material in the soil). Baiting detected 20 species, but failed to detect some of the species that fed on decayed materials. Paper baits, checked only twice (at 4 and 10 weeks following placement), were required to detect all species sampled at both wood and paper baits. Therefore, overall baiting costs could be reduced (without data loss) by using paper baits only and reducing the number of bait checks. Compared with baiting using all three bait types, reduced transects detected the most species and had the lowest per-species cost. Consequently, reduced transect surveys are the most effective method in these northern Australian savannas when assessing species composition. However, if the abundance of species that feed on undecayed wood or levels of termite activity are being assessed, then reduced baiting is a more appropriate method.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"63 4","pages":"447-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.12711","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.12711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Termites are important ecosystem engineers in many ecosystems globally. Hence, surveys of termite species composition, abundance and activity can be important for understanding ecosystem function—especially in biomes where they tend to be abundant, such as tropical savannas. However, comprehensively surveying termites can be challenging due to their cryptic nature and varied feeding and nesting habits, which strongly influence the effectiveness of different survey methods. Baiting and active searches of reduced transects are two methods commonly used to sample termites, and while these methods have been evaluated in the savannas of South Africa, this has not occurred in the extensive tropical savannas of northern Australia. Thus, this study evaluated the effectiveness of baits and reduced transects to assess termite species richness and activity across 18 × 1 ha experimental plots in a tropical savanna near Darwin, Australia. Surveys in each plot consisted of two 60 × 2 m transects and a 9 × 3 baiting grid of alternating buried wood and paper baits and surface straw baits. Baits were checked three times: at 4-, 7- and 10-week intervals following placement. Upon survey completion, the sampling effort, efficacy and costs of each method were compared. Reduced transects detected all 32 species recorded in this study, representing four feeding groups (from undecayed wood to highly decayed organic material in the soil). Baiting detected 20 species, but failed to detect some of the species that fed on decayed materials. Paper baits, checked only twice (at 4 and 10 weeks following placement), were required to detect all species sampled at both wood and paper baits. Therefore, overall baiting costs could be reduced (without data loss) by using paper baits only and reducing the number of bait checks. Compared with baiting using all three bait types, reduced transects detected the most species and had the lowest per-species cost. Consequently, reduced transect surveys are the most effective method in these northern Australian savannas when assessing species composition. However, if the abundance of species that feed on undecayed wood or levels of termite activity are being assessed, then reduced baiting is a more appropriate method.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚热带稀树草原白蚁调查方法的效果和成本
白蚁在全球许多生态系统中都是重要的生态系统工程师。因此,白蚁种类组成、丰度和活动的调查对于了解生态系统功能非常重要,特别是在白蚁数量丰富的生物群落中,如热带稀树草原。然而,全面调查白蚁是具有挑战性的,因为它们的隐蔽性和不同的摄食和筑巢习惯,这强烈影响了不同调查方法的有效性。诱饵和主动搜索缩小样带是白蚁取样的两种常用方法,虽然这些方法已在南非的稀树草原上进行了评估,但在澳大利亚北部广阔的热带稀树草原上尚未发生。因此,本研究在澳大利亚达尔文市附近的热带稀树草原18 × 1 ha试验样地评估了诱饵和减少样地白蚁物种丰富度和活动的有效性。每个样地的调查包括两个60 × 2 m的样带和一个9 × 3的饵网,饵网由埋地的木、纸饵和地表的稻草饵交替进行。在放置后的第4周、第7周和第10周对诱饵进行了三次检查。在调查完成后,比较每种方法的抽样努力、有效性和成本。减少样带检测到本研究中记录的所有32个物种,代表四个摄食组(从未腐烂的木材到土壤中高度腐烂的有机物质)。诱饵检测到20种,但未能检测到一些以腐烂材料为食的物种。纸质诱饵只需要检查两次(在放置后4周和10周),以检测在木材和纸质诱饵上取样的所有物种。因此,通过仅使用纸质诱饵和减少诱饵检查次数,可以降低总体诱饵成本(不丢失数据)。与使用所有三种饵料类型的饵料相比,减少样带检测到的饵料种类最多,单位饵料成本最低。因此,减少样带调查是评估物种组成最有效的方法。然而,如果正在评估以未腐烂木材为食的物种的丰度或白蚁活动水平,那么减少诱饵是更合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Entomology
Austral Entomology ENTOMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Austral Entomology is a scientific journal of entomology for the Southern Hemisphere. It publishes Original Articles that are peer-reviewed research papers from the study of the behaviour, biology, biosystematics, conservation biology, ecology, evolution, forensic and medical entomology, molecular biology, public health, urban entomology, physiology and the use and control of insects, arachnids and myriapods. The journal also publishes Reviews on research and theory or commentaries on current areas of research, innovation or rapid development likely to be of broad interest – these may be submitted or invited. Book Reviews will also be considered provided the works are of global significance. Manuscripts from authors in the Northern Hemisphere are encouraged provided that the research has relevance to or broad readership within the Southern Hemisphere. All submissions are peer-reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper. Special issues are encouraged; please contact the Chief Editor for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信