Reliability and Validity of Four Step Tests in Older Adults With Dementia

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Wayne Lap Sun Chan, Sharon Man Ha Tsang, Lily Yuen Wah Ho
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Four Step Tests in Older Adults With Dementia","authors":"Wayne Lap Sun Chan,&nbsp;Sharon Man Ha Tsang,&nbsp;Lily Yuen Wah Ho","doi":"10.1002/gps.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the test–retest and inter-rater reliability, concurrent and discriminative validity of the Four Square Step Test (FSST), the Choice Stepping Reaction Time Test (CSRTT), the Maximum Step Length Test (MSLT), and the Alternate Step Test (AST) in older adults with dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-seven older adults with dementia who could walk independently for at least 10 m were recruited at community centers and day care centers for older adults. The participants completed the step tests conducted by two independent raters on three separate testing occasions within 3 weeks. In addition, the physical and cognitive function of the participants were evaluated at baseline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The FSST, CSRTT, and MSLT showed good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.83–0.91), and the AST exhibited fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.70). All the step tests showed good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.75–0.94). The step tests had moderate-to-strong correlations with various physical and cognitive measures (Pearson correlation coefficients = 0.34–0.72). The MSLT side step and AST could differentiate between individuals who did and did not use a walking stick to ambulate (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.046). The FSST, CSRTT, and AST could differentiate between individuals with and without a major neurocognitive impairment (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.005).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The FSST, CSRTT, and MSLT were reliable and valid for examining the stepping performance of older adults with dementia. Clinicians can use these tests to evaluate the physical and cognitive function of this population and identify those with significant cognitive impairment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04296123</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the test–retest and inter-rater reliability, concurrent and discriminative validity of the Four Square Step Test (FSST), the Choice Stepping Reaction Time Test (CSRTT), the Maximum Step Length Test (MSLT), and the Alternate Step Test (AST) in older adults with dementia.

Methods

Thirty-seven older adults with dementia who could walk independently for at least 10 m were recruited at community centers and day care centers for older adults. The participants completed the step tests conducted by two independent raters on three separate testing occasions within 3 weeks. In addition, the physical and cognitive function of the participants were evaluated at baseline.

Results

The FSST, CSRTT, and MSLT showed good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.83–0.91), and the AST exhibited fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.70). All the step tests showed good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.75–0.94). The step tests had moderate-to-strong correlations with various physical and cognitive measures (Pearson correlation coefficients = 0.34–0.72). The MSLT side step and AST could differentiate between individuals who did and did not use a walking stick to ambulate (p ≤ 0.046). The FSST, CSRTT, and AST could differentiate between individuals with and without a major neurocognitive impairment (p ≤ 0.005).

Conclusion

The FSST, CSRTT, and MSLT were reliable and valid for examining the stepping performance of older adults with dementia. Clinicians can use these tests to evaluate the physical and cognitive function of this population and identify those with significant cognitive impairment.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04296123

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信