Strategic consensus at founding and product innovation performance in high-tech ventures

IF 10.5 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115082

Li-Qun Wei , Yan Ling , Franz W. Kellermanns , Yuli Zhang

{"title":"Strategic consensus at founding and product innovation performance in high-tech ventures","authors":"Li-Qun Wei , Yan Ling , Franz W. Kellermanns , Yuli Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines whether high-tech ventures would be better at product innovation if their top management team (TMT) members had higher levels of strategic consensus at founding, and, if so, how it happens. Taking the entrepreneurial process model (EPM) as our research lens, we propose that TMT strategic consensus can streamline opportunity recognition, leading to faster TMT decision-making; higher TMT decision speed then facilitates opportunity exploitation in which product innovation is realized. We also suggest that this indirect influence is contextually sensitive; that is, external conditions (specifically, environmental competitiveness) negatively moderate the relationship between strategic consensus and decision speed, and internal conditions (specifically, structural specialization among TMT members) positively moderate the relationship between decision speed and product innovation. Drawing on a sample of 92 Chinese high-tech ventures and using a lagged, multiple-respondent design, we found support for these arguments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 115082"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005861","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether high-tech ventures would be better at product innovation if their top management team (TMT) members had higher levels of strategic consensus at founding, and, if so, how it happens. Taking the entrepreneurial process model (EPM) as our research lens, we propose that TMT strategic consensus can streamline opportunity recognition, leading to faster TMT decision-making; higher TMT decision speed then facilitates opportunity exploitation in which product innovation is realized. We also suggest that this indirect influence is contextually sensitive; that is, external conditions (specifically, environmental competitiveness) negatively moderate the relationship between strategic consensus and decision speed, and internal conditions (specifically, structural specialization among TMT members) positively moderate the relationship between decision speed and product innovation. Drawing on a sample of 92 Chinese high-tech ventures and using a lagged, multiple-respondent design, we found support for these arguments.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Business Research BUSINESS-

CiteScore

20.30

自引率

10.60%

发文量

956

期刊介绍： The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.