How structures of common difference constrain and create equity in market society: A genealogy of an adroit practice performance

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Melissa Archpru Akaka , Hope Jensen Schau
{"title":"How structures of common difference constrain and create equity in market society: A genealogy of an adroit practice performance","authors":"Melissa Archpru Akaka ,&nbsp;Hope Jensen Schau","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate a globally diffused practice reimagined as a competitive sport through international professional contests. Competition rules reduce a complex cultural practice to a curated set of characteristics that reward adroit (skilled) performance with a bias towards male athletes. Through a practice genealogy, we explore how a <em>meso</em>-level structure of common difference (SCD) emerges through competition success metrics that marginalize female practitioners. We trace macro-level shifts in meaning and micro-level actions that that have led to an increase in equality through equal pay. However, equity across genders is constrained because the unique competences of male athletes remain dominant on scorecards without recognition of countervailing unique female athletes’ competences. We argue that inclusivity of multiple practice modalities is needed to increase the structural diversity (e.g., variation in norms) of an SCD. This has important implications for how market structuration can shape social structures and create a more equitable market society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 115038"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005423","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate a globally diffused practice reimagined as a competitive sport through international professional contests. Competition rules reduce a complex cultural practice to a curated set of characteristics that reward adroit (skilled) performance with a bias towards male athletes. Through a practice genealogy, we explore how a meso-level structure of common difference (SCD) emerges through competition success metrics that marginalize female practitioners. We trace macro-level shifts in meaning and micro-level actions that that have led to an increase in equality through equal pay. However, equity across genders is constrained because the unique competences of male athletes remain dominant on scorecards without recognition of countervailing unique female athletes’ competences. We argue that inclusivity of multiple practice modalities is needed to increase the structural diversity (e.g., variation in norms) of an SCD. This has important implications for how market structuration can shape social structures and create a more equitable market society.

Abstract Image

在市场社会中,共同差异结构如何约束和创造公平:一个熟练实践绩效的谱系
我们调查了一项全球扩散的实践,通过国际专业比赛将其重新想象为竞技体育。比赛规则将复杂的文化实践简化为一套精心策划的特征,奖励熟练的(熟练的)表现,偏袒男性运动员。通过实践谱系,我们探索了共同差异(SCD)的中观结构是如何通过边缘化女性从业者的竞争成功指标出现的。我们追踪了宏观层面的意义变化和微观层面的行动,这些变化通过同工同酬导致了平等程度的提高。然而,由于男性运动员的独特能力在记分卡上仍然占主导地位,而没有认识到女性运动员的独特能力。我们认为,需要多种实践模式的包容性来增加SCD的结构多样性(例如,规范的变化)。这对市场结构如何塑造社会结构和创造一个更公平的市场社会具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信