P.D.P.O. Peramuna , N.G.P.B. Neluwala , K.K. Wijesundara , S. DeSilva , S. Venkatesan , P.B.R. Dissanayake
{"title":"Enhancing 2D hydrodynamic flood model predictions in data-scarce regions through integration of multiple terrain datasets","authors":"P.D.P.O. Peramuna , N.G.P.B. Neluwala , K.K. Wijesundara , S. DeSilva , S. Venkatesan , P.B.R. Dissanayake","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Topography highly influences hydraulic model predictions. High-resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEM) are currently used in 2D flood modeling studies to create relatively more accurate flood inundation maps. However, the availability of high-resolution datasets, such as Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR), remains limited due to cost constraints. Thus, low-resolution global datasets are utilized in data-scarce regions. Merging high and low-resolution terrain datasets will be an alternative approach to improve flood models, and comprehensive analysis of such merged DEMs is lacking. Thus, a new DEM (V-DEM) is developed in this study by incorporating available LiDAR, SRTM, local DEM, and river cross-sectional data. 2D unsteady hydrodynamic model predictions are analyzed using the V-DEM, existing low-resolution global datasets, SRTM and MERIT Hydro, and their modified versions. V-DEM was found to create flood flow predictions with a better Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, significantly outperforming low-resolution global datasets. In addition, MERIT Hydro showed more than 50% improvement in the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency over SRTM in flow discharge predictions. There is a 110% improvement in the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency for hydrologically corrected SRTMs over the original SRTM. When SRTM is merged with LiDAR and hydrologically corrected, the predictions also showed an improvement of 146% over the original SRTM. Moreover, this study highlights that the vertical accuracy of terrain datasets has a more significant effect on the flood model predictions than the horizontal resolution, especially in the high and low-gradient regions of the study area. Overall, this study would benefit flood modelers in developing accurate DEMs, especially in the unavailability of high-resolution data for the entire study area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"648 ","pages":"Article 132343"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424017396","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Topography highly influences hydraulic model predictions. High-resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEM) are currently used in 2D flood modeling studies to create relatively more accurate flood inundation maps. However, the availability of high-resolution datasets, such as Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR), remains limited due to cost constraints. Thus, low-resolution global datasets are utilized in data-scarce regions. Merging high and low-resolution terrain datasets will be an alternative approach to improve flood models, and comprehensive analysis of such merged DEMs is lacking. Thus, a new DEM (V-DEM) is developed in this study by incorporating available LiDAR, SRTM, local DEM, and river cross-sectional data. 2D unsteady hydrodynamic model predictions are analyzed using the V-DEM, existing low-resolution global datasets, SRTM and MERIT Hydro, and their modified versions. V-DEM was found to create flood flow predictions with a better Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, significantly outperforming low-resolution global datasets. In addition, MERIT Hydro showed more than 50% improvement in the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency over SRTM in flow discharge predictions. There is a 110% improvement in the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency for hydrologically corrected SRTMs over the original SRTM. When SRTM is merged with LiDAR and hydrologically corrected, the predictions also showed an improvement of 146% over the original SRTM. Moreover, this study highlights that the vertical accuracy of terrain datasets has a more significant effect on the flood model predictions than the horizontal resolution, especially in the high and low-gradient regions of the study area. Overall, this study would benefit flood modelers in developing accurate DEMs, especially in the unavailability of high-resolution data for the entire study area.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.