Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for determining the optimal conservation priority of ecological services in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China
Pengcheng Zhao , Lihui Wang , Yuhong Huang , Yifan Zhao , Qichi Yang , Jinliang Huang , Yun Du , Feng Ling
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for determining the optimal conservation priority of ecological services in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China","authors":"Pengcheng Zhao , Lihui Wang , Yuhong Huang , Yifan Zhao , Qichi Yang , Jinliang Huang , Yun Du , Feng Ling","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The identification of conservation priority for ecosystem services (ESs) holds paramount importance in harmonizing environmental sustainability with human well-being and bolstering sustainable resource management. However, the utilization of a singular evaluation indicator and the employment of ambiguous methods for delineating conservation priorities have resulted in deviations in the decision-making processes. This study focused on the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area (DRA), the originating point and primary water source for the middle route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project, and employed the InVEST model to quantify five key ESs, including carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), water yield (WY), water purification (WP), and soil conservation (SC) for the period spanning from 2000 to 2020 to simulate seven pending priority scenarios by utilizing the ordered weighting algorithm (OWA). Additionally, it incorporated the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to formulate an evaluation indicator system that combines spatial distribution rationality, conservation efficiency, degree of trade-off, and policy compliance to quantify the scores for each pending scenario, thereby facilitating the determination of the optimal conservation priority. The results indicate a gradual temporal decline in these ESs. Spatially, CS, HQ, WP, and SC show strong synergies, while WY exhibits significant trade-offs with them. The optimal conservation priority, with a total area of 0.35 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup> and primarily located in the high mountainous and hilly regions in the southern and central parts of DRA, is covered by forest and grass land. It exhibits both high conservation efficiency and spatial distribution rationality, which are based on the policy compliance and effectively coordinates relationships among various ESs. This study offers new insights into the quantification and visualization of the identification of optimal conservation priority. The outcomes serve as a reference for informing the protection and management strategies of water source areas and regions with a high supply of ESs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112906"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The identification of conservation priority for ecosystem services (ESs) holds paramount importance in harmonizing environmental sustainability with human well-being and bolstering sustainable resource management. However, the utilization of a singular evaluation indicator and the employment of ambiguous methods for delineating conservation priorities have resulted in deviations in the decision-making processes. This study focused on the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area (DRA), the originating point and primary water source for the middle route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project, and employed the InVEST model to quantify five key ESs, including carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), water yield (WY), water purification (WP), and soil conservation (SC) for the period spanning from 2000 to 2020 to simulate seven pending priority scenarios by utilizing the ordered weighting algorithm (OWA). Additionally, it incorporated the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to formulate an evaluation indicator system that combines spatial distribution rationality, conservation efficiency, degree of trade-off, and policy compliance to quantify the scores for each pending scenario, thereby facilitating the determination of the optimal conservation priority. The results indicate a gradual temporal decline in these ESs. Spatially, CS, HQ, WP, and SC show strong synergies, while WY exhibits significant trade-offs with them. The optimal conservation priority, with a total area of 0.35 × 104 km2 and primarily located in the high mountainous and hilly regions in the southern and central parts of DRA, is covered by forest and grass land. It exhibits both high conservation efficiency and spatial distribution rationality, which are based on the policy compliance and effectively coordinates relationships among various ESs. This study offers new insights into the quantification and visualization of the identification of optimal conservation priority. The outcomes serve as a reference for informing the protection and management strategies of water source areas and regions with a high supply of ESs.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.