Impact of urban environments on FANET communication: A comparative study of propagation models

IF 4.4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Henok Gashaw , Jamie Wubben , Carlos T. Calafate , Fabrizio Granelli
{"title":"Impact of urban environments on FANET communication: A comparative study of propagation models","authors":"Henok Gashaw ,&nbsp;Jamie Wubben ,&nbsp;Carlos T. Calafate ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Granelli","doi":"10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The steady rise in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is leading to the development of an ever-growing number of applications. In urban settings, efforts like the U-Space initiative in Europe are striving to standardize and regulate the operations of UAVs. To support these applications and further UAV research, it is essential to thoroughly understand UAV communication, both among and between UAVs. Nonetheless, we have identified a lack of studies on communication models, especially in urban areas where obstacles like tall buildings can disrupt communication. This study offers a comprehensive review of current measurement campaigns on channel models for aerial communication. In addition, we conducted experiments on (i) the separation distance between two UAVs, (ii) Multi-UAV communication and (iii) Multi-UAV to ground communication using three different city profiles in Spain (Valencia, Barcelona, and Madrid). To accomplish this, we utilized an advanced co-simulation framework that accurately models both UAV mobility (Ardusim) and communication (OMNeT++). Our results regarding UAV-to-UAV communication in a city environment indicate that: (i) the communication range, in our specific experiments, is limited to around 400 meters. Afterward, the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) declines significantly. (ii) Different communication models yield similar results. (iii) UAV-to-UAV communication becomes feasible at higher altitudes (e.g., 120 m), particularly in the presence of tall buildings. With respect to the Multi-UAV to ground communications, we can conclude that again, the altitude of the UAVs is paramount. Furthermore, increasing the number of UAVs providing service to the ground does increase the PDR, but only ever so slightly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55555,"journal":{"name":"Ad Hoc Networks","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 103695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ad Hoc Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870524003068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The steady rise in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is leading to the development of an ever-growing number of applications. In urban settings, efforts like the U-Space initiative in Europe are striving to standardize and regulate the operations of UAVs. To support these applications and further UAV research, it is essential to thoroughly understand UAV communication, both among and between UAVs. Nonetheless, we have identified a lack of studies on communication models, especially in urban areas where obstacles like tall buildings can disrupt communication. This study offers a comprehensive review of current measurement campaigns on channel models for aerial communication. In addition, we conducted experiments on (i) the separation distance between two UAVs, (ii) Multi-UAV communication and (iii) Multi-UAV to ground communication using three different city profiles in Spain (Valencia, Barcelona, and Madrid). To accomplish this, we utilized an advanced co-simulation framework that accurately models both UAV mobility (Ardusim) and communication (OMNeT++). Our results regarding UAV-to-UAV communication in a city environment indicate that: (i) the communication range, in our specific experiments, is limited to around 400 meters. Afterward, the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) declines significantly. (ii) Different communication models yield similar results. (iii) UAV-to-UAV communication becomes feasible at higher altitudes (e.g., 120 m), particularly in the presence of tall buildings. With respect to the Multi-UAV to ground communications, we can conclude that again, the altitude of the UAVs is paramount. Furthermore, increasing the number of UAVs providing service to the ground does increase the PDR, but only ever so slightly.
城市环境对FANET传播的影响:传播模型的比较研究
无人驾驶飞行器(uav)使用的稳步增长正在导致越来越多的应用程序的发展。在城市环境中,欧洲的U-Space倡议等努力正在努力使无人机的操作标准化和规范化。为了支持这些应用和进一步的无人机研究,必须彻底了解无人机之间和无人机之间的通信。尽管如此,我们发现缺乏关于交流模式的研究,特别是在城市地区,像高层建筑这样的障碍会干扰交流。本研究对当前航空通信信道模型的测量活动进行了全面的回顾。此外,我们在(i)两架无人机之间的分离距离,(ii)多无人机通信和(iii)多无人机对地面通信使用西班牙的三个不同的城市轮廓(瓦伦西亚,巴塞罗那和马德里)进行了实验。为了实现这一目标,我们利用了一个先进的联合仿真框架,精确地模拟了无人机的机动性(Ardusim)和通信(omnet++)。我们关于城市环境中无人机对无人机通信的结果表明:(i)在我们的具体实验中,通信范围被限制在400米左右。之后,PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio)显著下降。不同的传播模式产生相似的结果。(iii)无人机对无人机通信在更高高度(例如,120米)变得可行,特别是在高层建筑存在的情况下。关于多无人机对地面通信,我们可以再次得出结论,无人机的高度是至关重要的。此外,增加为地面提供服务的无人机数量确实会增加PDR,但只是一点点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ad Hoc Networks
Ad Hoc Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Ad Hoc Networks is an international and archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in ad hoc and sensor networking areas. The Ad Hoc Networks considers original, high quality and unpublished contributions addressing all aspects of ad hoc and sensor networks. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Mobile and Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Sensor Networks Wireless Local and Personal Area Networks Home Networks Ad Hoc Networks of Autonomous Intelligent Systems Novel Architectures for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Self-organizing Network Architectures and Protocols Transport Layer Protocols Routing protocols (unicast, multicast, geocast, etc.) Media Access Control Techniques Error Control Schemes Power-Aware, Low-Power and Energy-Efficient Designs Synchronization and Scheduling Issues Mobility Management Mobility-Tolerant Communication Protocols Location Tracking and Location-based Services Resource and Information Management Security and Fault-Tolerance Issues Hardware and Software Platforms, Systems, and Testbeds Experimental and Prototype Results Quality-of-Service Issues Cross-Layer Interactions Scalability Issues Performance Analysis and Simulation of Protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信