Shining a light on disparities: A comparative analysis of residential photovoltaic adoption inequality in Australia and Brazil

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Gabriel Konzen , Rohan Best , Nivalde José de Castro
{"title":"Shining a light on disparities: A comparative analysis of residential photovoltaic adoption inequality in Australia and Brazil","authors":"Gabriel Konzen ,&nbsp;Rohan Best ,&nbsp;Nivalde José de Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103870"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.
照亮差距:澳大利亚和巴西住宅光伏采用不平等的比较分析
越来越多的人一致认为,能源转型也必须是公正的。在这种情况下,随着太阳能采用率的上升,住宅光伏(PV)系统采用率的不平等正在受到审查。尽管现有证据表明光伏采用不平等,但有必要研究这一问题在不同背景下的演变情况,特别是在发展中国家。本文旨在比较过去十年中澳大利亚和巴西在光伏采用方面的不平等。混合使用的方法包括分析描述性统计、太阳基尼指数和回归模型。研究结果显示,这两个国家在住宅光伏采用方面的不平等并没有实质性的改变。收入较低的五分之一群体比收入较高的群体面临更低的收养可能性。然而,澳大利亚表现得更好,在不同收入群体中太阳能系统的分配更加公平。不平等变化的缺乏表明,仅靠技术扩散可能无法消除低收入群体的光伏接入不平等。报告强调,目前需要制定有针对性的政策,以加强太阳能获取的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信