Redefining boundaries in innovation and knowledge domains: Investigating the impact of generative artificial intelligence on copyright and intellectual property rights

IF 15.6 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100630

Adil S. Al-Busaidi , Raghu Raman , Laurie Hughes , Mousa Ahmed Albashrawi , Tegwen Malik , Yogesh K. Dwivedi , Thuraiya Al- Alawi , Mohammed AlRizeiqi , Gareth Davies , Mark Fenwick , Parul Gupta , Shashikala Gurpur , Apeksha Hooda , Paulius Jurcys , Daryl Lim , Nicola Lucchi , Tanvi Misra , Ramakrishnan Raman , Anuragini Shirish , Paul Walton

{"title":"Redefining boundaries in innovation and knowledge domains: Investigating the impact of generative artificial intelligence on copyright and intellectual property rights","authors":"Adil S. Al-Busaidi , Raghu Raman , Laurie Hughes , Mousa Ahmed Albashrawi , Tegwen Malik , Yogesh K. Dwivedi , Thuraiya Al- Alawi , Mohammed AlRizeiqi , Gareth Davies , Mark Fenwick , Parul Gupta , Shashikala Gurpur , Apeksha Hooda , Paulius Jurcys , Daryl Lim , Nicola Lucchi , Tanvi Misra , Ramakrishnan Raman , Anuragini Shirish , Paul Walton","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI) into industries and society has prompted a re-evaluation of copyright and intellectual property rights (IPR) frameworks. GenAI's ability to produce original content using data from human-created sources raises critical ethical and legal concerns. Current copyright and IPR frameworks, designed around human authorship, are insufficient to address these challenges. This study, using a multi-perspective approach, explores GenAI's disruptive potential in replicating or transforming copyrighted materials, challenging established IPR norms. Findings highlight gaps in legislation and the opacity of GenAI platforms. To address these issues, this study presents a Dynamic Ethical Framework linked to a future global <em>fair use</em> policy, aiming to guide responsible GenAI development and use. By incorporating insights from domain experts, this study contextualizes emerging challenges and potential solutions within broader societal and technological trends. That said, this study calls for international collaboration and further research to reform IPR related laws and frameworks, ensuring they remain relevant and equitable in a GenAI-driven era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100630"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24001690","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI) into industries and society has prompted a re-evaluation of copyright and intellectual property rights (IPR) frameworks. GenAI's ability to produce original content using data from human-created sources raises critical ethical and legal concerns. Current copyright and IPR frameworks, designed around human authorship, are insufficient to address these challenges. This study, using a multi-perspective approach, explores GenAI's disruptive potential in replicating or transforming copyrighted materials, challenging established IPR norms. Findings highlight gaps in legislation and the opacity of GenAI platforms. To address these issues, this study presents a Dynamic Ethical Framework linked to a future global fair use policy, aiming to guide responsible GenAI development and use. By incorporating insights from domain experts, this study contextualizes emerging challenges and potential solutions within broader societal and technological trends. That said, this study calls for international collaboration and further research to reform IPR related laws and frameworks, ensuring they remain relevant and equitable in a GenAI-driven era.

查看原文本刊更多论文

重新定义创新和知识领域的边界：研究生成式人工智能对版权和知识产权的影响

生成式人工智能（GenAI）迅速融入行业和社会，促使人们重新评估版权和知识产权（IPR）框架。GenAI利用人工来源的数据制作原创内容的能力引发了关键的伦理和法律问题。目前围绕人类作者身份设计的版权和知识产权框架不足以应对这些挑战。本研究采用多视角方法，探讨了GenAI在复制或转化受版权保护材料方面的颠覆性潜力，挑战了现有的知识产权规范。调查结果突出了立法方面的差距和GenAI平台的不透明性。为了解决这些问题，本研究提出了一个与未来全球合理使用政策相关联的动态伦理框架，旨在指导负责任的基因ai开发和使用。通过结合领域专家的见解，本研究将新兴挑战和潜在解决方案置于更广泛的社会和技术趋势中。尽管如此，本研究呼吁国际合作和进一步研究，以改革与知识产权相关的法律和框架，确保它们在基因驱动的时代保持相关性和公平性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Multiple-

CiteScore

16.10

自引率

12.70%

发文量

118

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.