New paleomagnetic and geochronologic results from the eastern Tethyan Himalaya refine the size of Greater India in the Early Cretaceous

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jie Yuan, Wenxing Hao, Ruoyuan Qiu
{"title":"New paleomagnetic and geochronologic results from the eastern Tethyan Himalaya refine the size of Greater India in the Early Cretaceous","authors":"Jie Yuan,&nbsp;Wenxing Hao,&nbsp;Ruoyuan Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.jseaes.2024.106428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Knowledge of the original size of Greater India in the Early Cretaceous is critical for Late Mesozoic East Gondwana reconstructions. However, estimates of Greater India extent have significant discrepancies in the Early Cretaceous. Here we report geochronologic and paleomagnetic studies on rocks of the Jiabula Formation in the northern subzone of the Tethyan Himalaya. The studied limestones are characterized by two-component magnetizations carried by detrital magnetite, which retains a primary remanence. Correspondingly, the high temperature magnetization components (350−525 °C) are isolated from 204 specimens using high-resolution thermal demagnetization. The new paleomagnetic data provide, after inclination shallowing estimation, an Early Cretaceous paleopole of 11.2°N/300.5°E, A<sub>95</sub> = 2.6°, which places the eastern part of the Tethyan Himalaya at a paleolatitude of 40.9° ± 2.6°S at ca. 126 Ma. Comparison of the new observed paleolatitude with the expected paleolatitude (49.7° ± 2.8°S) of India implies that Greater India had an extension of 968±418 km (8.8° ± 3.8°) at ca. 126 Ma. Integrating the new results with our previous Campanian results (ca. 75 Ma), we conclude that Greater India had a comparable extension of ∼900 km during ca. 126−75 Ma. The improved estimate of the dimensions of Greater India leads to an updated reconstruction of paleogeography in the Early Cretaceous.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50253,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Earth Sciences","volume":"278 ","pages":"Article 106428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367912024004231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge of the original size of Greater India in the Early Cretaceous is critical for Late Mesozoic East Gondwana reconstructions. However, estimates of Greater India extent have significant discrepancies in the Early Cretaceous. Here we report geochronologic and paleomagnetic studies on rocks of the Jiabula Formation in the northern subzone of the Tethyan Himalaya. The studied limestones are characterized by two-component magnetizations carried by detrital magnetite, which retains a primary remanence. Correspondingly, the high temperature magnetization components (350−525 °C) are isolated from 204 specimens using high-resolution thermal demagnetization. The new paleomagnetic data provide, after inclination shallowing estimation, an Early Cretaceous paleopole of 11.2°N/300.5°E, A95 = 2.6°, which places the eastern part of the Tethyan Himalaya at a paleolatitude of 40.9° ± 2.6°S at ca. 126 Ma. Comparison of the new observed paleolatitude with the expected paleolatitude (49.7° ± 2.8°S) of India implies that Greater India had an extension of 968±418 km (8.8° ± 3.8°) at ca. 126 Ma. Integrating the new results with our previous Campanian results (ca. 75 Ma), we conclude that Greater India had a comparable extension of ∼900 km during ca. 126−75 Ma. The improved estimate of the dimensions of Greater India leads to an updated reconstruction of paleogeography in the Early Cretaceous.
来自特提斯喜马拉雅东部的新的古地磁和地质年代学结果细化了早白垩纪大印度的大小
了解早白垩世大印度的原始大小对中生代晚期东冈瓦纳的重建至关重要。然而,对大印度范围的估计在早白垩纪有很大的差异。本文报道了特提斯喜马拉雅北亚带嘉布拉组岩石的年代学和古地磁研究。研究的灰岩具有由碎屑磁铁矿携带的双组分磁化特征,并保留了原生剩余物。采用高分辨率热退磁技术,从204个样品中分离出高温磁化成分(350 ~ 525°C)。新的古地磁资料经倾斜浅化估计,提供了一个11.2°N/300.5°E, A95 = 2.6°的早白垩世古极,使特提斯喜马拉雅东部的古纬度为40.9°±2.6°S,约为126 Ma。将新观测到的古纬度与印度的预期古纬度(49.7°±2.8°S)进行比较,表明大印度在约126 Ma时延伸了968±418 km(8.8°±3.8°)。将新的结果与我们之前的坎帕尼亚期结果(约75 Ma)相结合,我们得出结论,大印度在约126−75 Ma期间有类似的延伸~ 900公里。对大印度大陆规模的改进估计导致了对早白垩纪古地理的更新重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences has an open access mirror journal Journal of Asian Earth Sciences: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Asian Earth Sciences is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to all aspects of research related to the solid Earth Sciences of Asia. The Journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers on the regional geology, tectonics, geochemistry and geophysics of Asia. It will be devoted primarily to research papers but short communications relating to new developments of broad interest, reviews and book reviews will also be included. Papers must have international appeal and should present work of more than local significance. The scope includes deep processes of the Asian continent and its adjacent oceans; seismology and earthquakes; orogeny, magmatism, metamorphism and volcanism; growth, deformation and destruction of the Asian crust; crust-mantle interaction; evolution of life (early life, biostratigraphy, biogeography and mass-extinction); fluids, fluxes and reservoirs of mineral and energy resources; surface processes (weathering, erosion, transport and deposition of sediments) and resulting geomorphology; and the response of the Earth to global climate change as viewed within the Asian continent and surrounding oceans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信