{"title":"Water utility network loss reduction and service quality under price cap and rate of return regulation","authors":"Selvin Thanacoody","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water utilities in Eastern Europe are regulated under different schemes and achieve different water utility network loss reductions and service quality levels. Through a theoretical model, we analyse a water utility’s response to price-cap or rate-of-return regulation when setting their levels of water loss reduction and service quality. Lower price caps induce the firm to reduce water losses when demand is inelastic, while higher rates of return lead the firm to reduce water losses only from low levels of the ROR model. Service quality increases in the price cap but shrinks in the ROR model. We show that PC regulation is a superior policy when the cost of capital is not too high, as the firm can efficiently supply at a low price and provide some level of quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 101857"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water utilities in Eastern Europe are regulated under different schemes and achieve different water utility network loss reductions and service quality levels. Through a theoretical model, we analyse a water utility’s response to price-cap or rate-of-return regulation when setting their levels of water loss reduction and service quality. Lower price caps induce the firm to reduce water losses when demand is inelastic, while higher rates of return lead the firm to reduce water losses only from low levels of the ROR model. Service quality increases in the price cap but shrinks in the ROR model. We show that PC regulation is a superior policy when the cost of capital is not too high, as the firm can efficiently supply at a low price and provide some level of quality.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.