Effects of lift-up building design, building setback, and urban open space on pedestrian danger under the joint effect of floodwater and wind

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shuyou Liu , Zhongfan Zhu , Wenqi Wu , Dawei Zhang , Dingzhi Peng , Bo Pang
{"title":"Effects of lift-up building design, building setback, and urban open space on pedestrian danger under the joint effect of floodwater and wind","authors":"Shuyou Liu ,&nbsp;Zhongfan Zhu ,&nbsp;Wenqi Wu ,&nbsp;Dawei Zhang ,&nbsp;Dingzhi Peng ,&nbsp;Bo Pang","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban block layouts affect both the flow patterns of floodwater and wind in urban built environments and ultimately pedestrian danger within the urban building array. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to simulate both the floodwater inundation process and the wind-blowing process within three kinds of urban block configurations under a floodwater-wind joint effect, including the lift-up building design, horizontal and vertical building setbacks, and urban open space. The obtained floodwater velocity, depth, and wind speed at the pedestrian level are adopted to quantify the level of pedestrian danger by using the instability threshold formula of a human body. A laboratory flume experiment regarding the stability/instability of a dummy that represents a pedestrian in a quasi-natural state is performed to qualitatively validate the numerical simulation results. Compared to the cuboid or triangular pillar that supports the lift-up building structure, the circular pillar yields the minimum resistance against floodwater and increases the wind speed at the pedestrian level, consequently leading to a large danger zone area. Horizontal building setbacks decrease the pedestrian danger, but vertical building setbacks intricately affect it. The existence of open space within the block decreases pedestrian danger to some extent depending on the location and area of open space. The wind plays the dominant role in triggering pedestrian instability for both the lift-up building design and the horizontal setback case. For both the lift-up building design and the open space configuration, the walking and running speeds of pedestrians decrease much more than the conventional urban block. The results of this study could be referred to by administrators and stakeholders in the design and management of urban building arrays to mitigate pedestrian risk in the content of resilient city management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 102215"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095524004127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban block layouts affect both the flow patterns of floodwater and wind in urban built environments and ultimately pedestrian danger within the urban building array. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to simulate both the floodwater inundation process and the wind-blowing process within three kinds of urban block configurations under a floodwater-wind joint effect, including the lift-up building design, horizontal and vertical building setbacks, and urban open space. The obtained floodwater velocity, depth, and wind speed at the pedestrian level are adopted to quantify the level of pedestrian danger by using the instability threshold formula of a human body. A laboratory flume experiment regarding the stability/instability of a dummy that represents a pedestrian in a quasi-natural state is performed to qualitatively validate the numerical simulation results. Compared to the cuboid or triangular pillar that supports the lift-up building structure, the circular pillar yields the minimum resistance against floodwater and increases the wind speed at the pedestrian level, consequently leading to a large danger zone area. Horizontal building setbacks decrease the pedestrian danger, but vertical building setbacks intricately affect it. The existence of open space within the block decreases pedestrian danger to some extent depending on the location and area of open space. The wind plays the dominant role in triggering pedestrian instability for both the lift-up building design and the horizontal setback case. For both the lift-up building design and the open space configuration, the walking and running speeds of pedestrians decrease much more than the conventional urban block. The results of this study could be referred to by administrators and stakeholders in the design and management of urban building arrays to mitigate pedestrian risk in the content of resilient city management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Climate
Urban Climate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following: Urban meteorology and climate[...] Urban environmental pollution[...] Adaptation to global change[...] Urban economic and social issues[...] Research Approaches[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信