How does supervisor support impact Chinese graduate students’ research creativity through research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation? – A multi-group analysis

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Shilong Li , Jinyan Huang , Shahbaz Hussain , Yaxin Dong
{"title":"How does supervisor support impact Chinese graduate students’ research creativity through research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation? – A multi-group analysis","authors":"Shilong Li ,&nbsp;Jinyan Huang ,&nbsp;Shahbaz Hussain ,&nbsp;Yaxin Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study utilized a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the influence of supervisor support on Chinese graduate students’ research creativity, mediated by research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. The sample comprised 1781 graduate students from 42 Chinese universities. Data were gathered using a 33-item five-point Likert scale survey to gauge perceptions of supervisor support (spanning academic, personal, and autonomy facets), research self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and research creativity. The study specifically probed how research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation acted as mediators in the relationship between the three types of supervisor support and research creativity. Additionally, potential differences in the structural equation model based on gender (male vs. female) and academic major (arts vs. sciences) were examined. Results showed that both self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation had a notable impact on research creativity. Furthermore, all three types of supervisor support exerted direct effects on research creativity. Research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation served as partial mediators between supervisor support and research creativity. No significant model differences were found between genders or academic majors. Practically, it suggests that institutions should foster supportive environments to boost students’ confidence and autonomy, leading to greater creative output.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilized a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the influence of supervisor support on Chinese graduate students’ research creativity, mediated by research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. The sample comprised 1781 graduate students from 42 Chinese universities. Data were gathered using a 33-item five-point Likert scale survey to gauge perceptions of supervisor support (spanning academic, personal, and autonomy facets), research self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and research creativity. The study specifically probed how research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation acted as mediators in the relationship between the three types of supervisor support and research creativity. Additionally, potential differences in the structural equation model based on gender (male vs. female) and academic major (arts vs. sciences) were examined. Results showed that both self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation had a notable impact on research creativity. Furthermore, all three types of supervisor support exerted direct effects on research creativity. Research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation served as partial mediators between supervisor support and research creativity. No significant model differences were found between genders or academic majors. Practically, it suggests that institutions should foster supportive environments to boost students’ confidence and autonomy, leading to greater creative output.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信