{"title":"How does identifying with one's nation predict support for wars? The role of secure national identification and national narcissism","authors":"Olga Gulevich , Evgeny Osin","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>National identity has a significant influence on people's attitudes and behavior. However, several researchers make a distinction between secure national identification and national narcissism. In the present study, we analyzed the relationship of different forms of national identity with militaristic attitudes, i.e. attitudes toward a specific military campaign, to war in general as a way of international conflict resolution, as well as to excessive military violence against prisoners of war and civilians. We used cross-sectional design in several online studies. In Study 1, we measured only the attitudes toward the activity of Russian troops in Ukraine, and in Studies 2a and 2b, four different forms of military attitudes. The studies have revealed differences in the associations of secure national identification and national narcissism with militaristic attitudes. Secure national identification was positively associated with attitudes toward the government-approved military action in Ukraine and, to a lesser extent, to war in general as a way of international conflict resolution. At the same time, national narcissism was positively associated with attitudes toward all forms of military violence. We interpret these results with reference to the content of Russian national identity and social context in modern Russia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 112970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
National identity has a significant influence on people's attitudes and behavior. However, several researchers make a distinction between secure national identification and national narcissism. In the present study, we analyzed the relationship of different forms of national identity with militaristic attitudes, i.e. attitudes toward a specific military campaign, to war in general as a way of international conflict resolution, as well as to excessive military violence against prisoners of war and civilians. We used cross-sectional design in several online studies. In Study 1, we measured only the attitudes toward the activity of Russian troops in Ukraine, and in Studies 2a and 2b, four different forms of military attitudes. The studies have revealed differences in the associations of secure national identification and national narcissism with militaristic attitudes. Secure national identification was positively associated with attitudes toward the government-approved military action in Ukraine and, to a lesser extent, to war in general as a way of international conflict resolution. At the same time, national narcissism was positively associated with attitudes toward all forms of military violence. We interpret these results with reference to the content of Russian national identity and social context in modern Russia.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.