Comparing experimental designs for parameterizing semi-empirical and deep learning-based lithium-ion battery aging models

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Thomas Kröger , Sven Maisel , Georg Jank , Kareem Abo Gamra , Tobias Brehler , Markus Lienkamp
{"title":"Comparing experimental designs for parameterizing semi-empirical and deep learning-based lithium-ion battery aging models","authors":"Thomas Kröger ,&nbsp;Sven Maisel ,&nbsp;Georg Jank ,&nbsp;Kareem Abo Gamra ,&nbsp;Tobias Brehler ,&nbsp;Markus Lienkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2024.114702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design of Experiment (DOE) methods can be applied to optimize test plans of cycle life aging studies with the aim to efficiently parameterize lithium-ion battery aging models. Since different DOEs exist and their effect on the prediction performance of battery aging models has not yet been investigated, we conducted a cycle life aging study with six commonly used DOEs (One-factor-at-a-time, Taguchi, Box–Behnken, Central Composite, Full Factorial, and D-optimal) and compare their influence on the prediction performance of a semi-empirical and a deep learning-based battery aging model. The results show that the semi-empirical model benefits the most from statistically optimized test plans. Compared to randomly selecting test plans, applying DOE methods helps to consistently achieve one of the lowest possible prediction errors for a given number of test points. Furthermore, it is shown that a D-optimal test plan and the test plans obtained from response surface methods (Box–Behnken and Central Composite) require only half as many test points as a Full Factorial test design, but still result in semi-empirical models with a high prediction accuracy that is similar to the Full Factorial test design. In contrast, deep learning-based battery aging models benefit significantly less from statistically optimized test plans. The highest prediction accuracy is achieved by the Full Factorial test plan and all other DOEs result in higher prediction errors and are even outperformed by several randomly defined test plans. Instead of using static designs, deep-learning-based models profit from a dynamic test optimization, which reduces the number of tested batteries during cycle life testing based on their information gain. We demonstrate that with our proposed dynamic test reduction algorithm, which analyzes the information gain based on aging features extracted after 100 EFC of cycling, up to 50% of all tested batteries of a Full Factorial test plan can be excluded from the cycle life study without deteriorating the prediction accuracy of the resulting deep learning-based battery aging model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 114702"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X24042889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design of Experiment (DOE) methods can be applied to optimize test plans of cycle life aging studies with the aim to efficiently parameterize lithium-ion battery aging models. Since different DOEs exist and their effect on the prediction performance of battery aging models has not yet been investigated, we conducted a cycle life aging study with six commonly used DOEs (One-factor-at-a-time, Taguchi, Box–Behnken, Central Composite, Full Factorial, and D-optimal) and compare their influence on the prediction performance of a semi-empirical and a deep learning-based battery aging model. The results show that the semi-empirical model benefits the most from statistically optimized test plans. Compared to randomly selecting test plans, applying DOE methods helps to consistently achieve one of the lowest possible prediction errors for a given number of test points. Furthermore, it is shown that a D-optimal test plan and the test plans obtained from response surface methods (Box–Behnken and Central Composite) require only half as many test points as a Full Factorial test design, but still result in semi-empirical models with a high prediction accuracy that is similar to the Full Factorial test design. In contrast, deep learning-based battery aging models benefit significantly less from statistically optimized test plans. The highest prediction accuracy is achieved by the Full Factorial test plan and all other DOEs result in higher prediction errors and are even outperformed by several randomly defined test plans. Instead of using static designs, deep-learning-based models profit from a dynamic test optimization, which reduces the number of tested batteries during cycle life testing based on their information gain. We demonstrate that with our proposed dynamic test reduction algorithm, which analyzes the information gain based on aging features extracted after 100 EFC of cycling, up to 50% of all tested batteries of a Full Factorial test plan can be excluded from the cycle life study without deteriorating the prediction accuracy of the resulting deep learning-based battery aging model.

Abstract Image

基于半经验和深度学习的锂离子电池老化模型参数化实验设计比较
实验设计(DOE)方法可用于优化循环寿命老化研究的试验计划,以有效地参数化锂离子电池老化模型。由于不同的do存在并且它们对电池老化模型预测性能的影响尚未被研究,我们对六种常用的do (One-factor-at-a-time, Taguchi, Box-Behnken, Central Composite, Full Factorial和D-optimal)进行了循环寿命老化研究,并比较了它们对半经验和深度学习电池老化模型预测性能的影响。结果表明,半经验模型从统计优化的试验方案中获益最大。与随机选择测试计划相比,应用DOE方法有助于在给定数量的测试点上始终如一地实现最低可能的预测误差之一。此外,研究表明,d -最优测试计划和响应面方法(Box-Behnken和Central Composite)获得的测试计划所需的测试点数量仅为全因子测试设计的一半,但仍然可以得到与全因子测试设计相似的具有高预测精度的半经验模型。相比之下,基于深度学习的电池老化模型从统计优化的测试计划中获益明显较少。全因子测试计划实现了最高的预测精度,而所有其他do导致更高的预测误差,甚至被几个随机定义的测试计划超越。与使用静态设计不同,基于深度学习的模型受益于动态测试优化,基于信息增益减少了循环寿命测试中测试电池的数量。我们证明,使用我们提出的动态测试约简算法(该算法基于循环100次EFC后提取的老化特征分析信息增益),可以在不降低基于深度学习的电池老化模型的预测精度的情况下,将全因子测试计划中多达50%的测试电池排除在循环寿命研究之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信