Bread Consumption and Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

IF 3.8 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Glenn A Gaesser , Siddhartha S Angadi , Craig Paterson , Julie Miller Jones
{"title":"Bread Consumption and Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies","authors":"Glenn A Gaesser ,&nbsp;Siddhartha S Angadi ,&nbsp;Craig Paterson ,&nbsp;Julie Miller Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Because bread can contain potential carcinogens such as acrylamide, and is widely consumed, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether bread consumption is associated with increased cancer risk. PubMed and Medline databases were searched up to 1 March 2024, for studies that provided hazard ratios (HRs) (or similar) for bread consumption and cancer incidence or mortality. Only prospective cohort studies were included. We used the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Meta-analysis was performed with Cochrane’s RevMan 5.4.1 software using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane’s <em>Q</em> (χ<sup>2</sup>) and <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> statistics, and publication bias was assessed with Egger’s test. Twenty-four publications met inclusion criteria, including 1,887,074 adults, and were included in the systematic review. Ten publications that provided HRs were included in the meta-analysis for highest compared with lowest intakes, and an additional 7 publications that provided mortality or incident rate ratios or relative risks were included in supplemental meta-analyses. Of 108 reported HRs (or similar), 97 (79%) were either not statistically significant (<em>n</em> = 86) or indicated lower cancer risk (<em>n</em> = 11) associated with the highest intakes of bread. The meta-analysis indicated that bread intake was not associated with site-specific cancer risk [HR: 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89, 1.14; <em>P</em> = 0.92; 8 publications] or total cancer mortality (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.11; <em>P</em> = 0.32; 2 publications). Supplemental meta-analyses using all risk estimates in addition to HRs confirmed these findings. Whole-grain bread was associated with a lower site-specific cancer risk, mainly because of reduced colorectal cancer risk. Results of the systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that bread consumption is not associated with increased site-specific cancer risk, whereas high whole-grain/nonwhite bread consumption is associated with lower total cancer mortality and colorectal cancer risk.</div><div>This study was registered at Clinical Trials Registry of PROSPERO as registration number CRD42023414156.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"8 12","pages":"Article 104501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because bread can contain potential carcinogens such as acrylamide, and is widely consumed, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether bread consumption is associated with increased cancer risk. PubMed and Medline databases were searched up to 1 March 2024, for studies that provided hazard ratios (HRs) (or similar) for bread consumption and cancer incidence or mortality. Only prospective cohort studies were included. We used the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Meta-analysis was performed with Cochrane’s RevMan 5.4.1 software using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane’s Q2) and I2 statistics, and publication bias was assessed with Egger’s test. Twenty-four publications met inclusion criteria, including 1,887,074 adults, and were included in the systematic review. Ten publications that provided HRs were included in the meta-analysis for highest compared with lowest intakes, and an additional 7 publications that provided mortality or incident rate ratios or relative risks were included in supplemental meta-analyses. Of 108 reported HRs (or similar), 97 (79%) were either not statistically significant (n = 86) or indicated lower cancer risk (n = 11) associated with the highest intakes of bread. The meta-analysis indicated that bread intake was not associated with site-specific cancer risk [HR: 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89, 1.14; P = 0.92; 8 publications] or total cancer mortality (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.11; P = 0.32; 2 publications). Supplemental meta-analyses using all risk estimates in addition to HRs confirmed these findings. Whole-grain bread was associated with a lower site-specific cancer risk, mainly because of reduced colorectal cancer risk. Results of the systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that bread consumption is not associated with increased site-specific cancer risk, whereas high whole-grain/nonwhite bread consumption is associated with lower total cancer mortality and colorectal cancer risk.
This study was registered at Clinical Trials Registry of PROSPERO as registration number CRD42023414156.
面包消费与癌症风险:前瞻性队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
由于面包可能含有丙烯酰胺等潜在致癌物,并且被广泛食用,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定面包的食用是否与癌症风险增加有关。PubMed和Medline数据库被检索至2024年3月1日,寻找提供面包消费与癌症发病率或死亡率的风险比(hr)(或类似)的研究。仅纳入前瞻性队列研究。我们使用了系统评价和荟萃分析清单的首选报告项目。meta分析采用Cochrane RevMan 5.4.1软件,采用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型。采用Cochrane’s Q (χ2)和I2统计量评估异质性,采用Egger’s检验评估发表偏倚。24篇出版物符合纳入标准,包括1,887,074名成人,纳入系统评价。10篇提供hr的文献被纳入最高与最低摄入量的meta分析,另外7篇提供死亡率或发病率比或相对风险的文献被纳入补充meta分析。在108例报告的hr(或类似)中,97例(79%)要么没有统计学意义(n = 86),要么表明最高面包摄入量与较低的癌症风险(n = 11)相关。meta分析表明,面包摄入量与部位特异性癌症风险无关[HR: 1.01;95%置信区间(CI): 0.89, 1.14;P = 0.92;8篇出版物]或总癌症死亡率(HR: 0.90;95% ci: 0.73, 1.11;P = 0.32;2出版物)。补充荟萃分析使用所有风险评估和hr证实了这些发现。全麦面包与较低的部位特异性癌症风险相关,主要是因为它降低了结直肠癌的风险。系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,面包的摄入量与特定部位癌症风险的增加无关,而高全麦/非白面包的摄入量与较低的癌症总死亡率和结直肠癌风险相关。本研究已在普洛斯彼罗临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为CRD42023414156。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信