Trans-saccadic integration for object recognition peters out with pre-saccadic object eccentricity as target-directed saccades become more saliency-driven
{"title":"Trans-saccadic integration for object recognition peters out with pre-saccadic object eccentricity as target-directed saccades become more saliency-driven","authors":"Junhao Liang, Li Zhaoping","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bringing objects from peripheral locations to fovea via saccades facilitates their recognition. Human observers integrate pre- and post-saccadic information for recognition. This integration has only been investigated using instructed saccades to prescribed locations. Typically, the target has a fixed pre-saccadic location in an uncluttered scene and is viewed by a pre-determined post-saccadic duration. Consequently, whether trans-saccadic integration is limited or absent when the pre-saccadic target eccentricity is too large in cluttered scenes in unknown. Our study revealed this limit during visual exploration, when observers decided themselves when and to where to make their saccades. We asked thirty observers (400 trials each) to find and report as quickly as possible a target amongst 404 non-targets in an image spanning <span><math><mrow><mn>57</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>°</mo><mo>×</mo><mn>33</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span> in visual angle. We measured the target’s pre-saccadic eccentricity <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span>, the duration <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of the fixation before the saccade, and the post-saccadic foveal viewing duration <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. This <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> increased with <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> before starting to saturate around eccentricity <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>°</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>20</mn><mo>°</mo></mrow></math></span>. Meanwhile, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> increased much more slowly with <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> and started decreasing before <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. These observations imply the following at sufficiently large pre-saccadic eccentricities: the trans-saccadic integration ceases, target recognition relies exclusively on post-saccadic foveal vision, decision to saccade to the target relies exclusively on target saliency rather than identification. These implications should be applicable to general behavior, although <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> should depend on object and scene properties. They are consistent with the Central-peripheral Dichotomy that central and peripheral vision are specialized for seeing and looking, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 108500"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bringing objects from peripheral locations to fovea via saccades facilitates their recognition. Human observers integrate pre- and post-saccadic information for recognition. This integration has only been investigated using instructed saccades to prescribed locations. Typically, the target has a fixed pre-saccadic location in an uncluttered scene and is viewed by a pre-determined post-saccadic duration. Consequently, whether trans-saccadic integration is limited or absent when the pre-saccadic target eccentricity is too large in cluttered scenes in unknown. Our study revealed this limit during visual exploration, when observers decided themselves when and to where to make their saccades. We asked thirty observers (400 trials each) to find and report as quickly as possible a target amongst 404 non-targets in an image spanning in visual angle. We measured the target’s pre-saccadic eccentricity , the duration of the fixation before the saccade, and the post-saccadic foveal viewing duration . This increased with before starting to saturate around eccentricity . Meanwhile, increased much more slowly with and started decreasing before . These observations imply the following at sufficiently large pre-saccadic eccentricities: the trans-saccadic integration ceases, target recognition relies exclusively on post-saccadic foveal vision, decision to saccade to the target relies exclusively on target saliency rather than identification. These implications should be applicable to general behavior, although should depend on object and scene properties. They are consistent with the Central-peripheral Dichotomy that central and peripheral vision are specialized for seeing and looking, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.