Hongmei Wu , Di Wang , Xuena Wang , Yeqing Gu , Ge Meng , Qing Zhang , Li Liu , Xing Wang , Shaomei Sun , Qiyu Jia , Kun Song , Jian Huang , Junsheng Huo , Bing Zhang , Gangqiang Ding , Hong Chang , Kaijun Niu
{"title":"The association between handgrip strength and metabolic syndrome: A large prospective Chinese cohort study","authors":"Hongmei Wu , Di Wang , Xuena Wang , Yeqing Gu , Ge Meng , Qing Zhang , Li Liu , Xing Wang , Shaomei Sun , Qiyu Jia , Kun Song , Jian Huang , Junsheng Huo , Bing Zhang , Gangqiang Ding , Hong Chang , Kaijun Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Many studies have explored the association between handgrip strength and metabolic syndrome; however, the findings are inconsistent due to the different types of indicators used to assess handgrip strength (absolute vs. relative handgrip strength). This prospective cohort study aimed to simultaneously investigate the associations of both absolute and relative handgrip strength with metabolic syndrome, and to compare the predictive abilities of these two measures among Chinese adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze 15,820 participants (49.7 % men) living in Tianjin, China. Handgrip strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer. Relative handgrip strength was normalized to body weight (kg).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 6-year follow-up, there were 3385 incident cases of metabolic syndrome. The fully adjusted hazards ratios (95 % confidence interval) of the incidence of metabolic syndrome for increasing quartiles of relative handgrip strength were: 1.000 (reference), 0.871(0.780, 0.973), 0.675(0.602, 0.757), 0.454(0.401, 0.513) in men and 1.000 (reference), 0.830(0.714, 0.966), 0.561(0.471, 0.668), and 0.369(0.301, 0.452) in women (both <em>P</em> for trend <0.0001). The optimal cut-off of relative handgrip strength to predict incident metabolic syndrome was 0.563 kg/kg in men (sensitivity = 64.3 %, specificity = 55.6 %) and 0.436 kg/kg in women (sensitivity = 57.0 %, specificity = 69.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This large cohort study showed that higher relative handgrip strength, but not absolute handgrip strength, was associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome. Although handgrip strength may not be highly sensitive in screening for metabolic syndrome, it remains a valuable predictive tool due to its convenience, ease of measurement, and cost-effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 108157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224002524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Many studies have explored the association between handgrip strength and metabolic syndrome; however, the findings are inconsistent due to the different types of indicators used to assess handgrip strength (absolute vs. relative handgrip strength). This prospective cohort study aimed to simultaneously investigate the associations of both absolute and relative handgrip strength with metabolic syndrome, and to compare the predictive abilities of these two measures among Chinese adults.
Methods
Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze 15,820 participants (49.7 % men) living in Tianjin, China. Handgrip strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer. Relative handgrip strength was normalized to body weight (kg).
Results
During the 6-year follow-up, there were 3385 incident cases of metabolic syndrome. The fully adjusted hazards ratios (95 % confidence interval) of the incidence of metabolic syndrome for increasing quartiles of relative handgrip strength were: 1.000 (reference), 0.871(0.780, 0.973), 0.675(0.602, 0.757), 0.454(0.401, 0.513) in men and 1.000 (reference), 0.830(0.714, 0.966), 0.561(0.471, 0.668), and 0.369(0.301, 0.452) in women (both P for trend <0.0001). The optimal cut-off of relative handgrip strength to predict incident metabolic syndrome was 0.563 kg/kg in men (sensitivity = 64.3 %, specificity = 55.6 %) and 0.436 kg/kg in women (sensitivity = 57.0 %, specificity = 69.3 %).
Conclusions
This large cohort study showed that higher relative handgrip strength, but not absolute handgrip strength, was associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome. Although handgrip strength may not be highly sensitive in screening for metabolic syndrome, it remains a valuable predictive tool due to its convenience, ease of measurement, and cost-effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care.
Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life