Personality profiles in SAPA data: An exploratory study

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Marija Bojanić, Petar Čolović
{"title":"Personality profiles in SAPA data: An exploratory study","authors":"Marija Bojanić,&nbsp;Petar Čolović","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the last two decades, individual differences have been examined from a person-oriented approach which tends to classify individuals into personality types based on their unique configurations of personality traits. Previous typological studies explored the consistency of personality profiles by varying different methodological factors (e.g., sample characteristics, personality theoretical frameworks, personality assessment methods, and data analysis methods). The aim of the study was to explore the replicability of personality profiles based on three major personality models (Big Five, HEXACO, and Tellegen's model) across two large SAPA (Synthetic Aperture Personality Assessment) datasets. Data analysis included the following steps: model-based clustering, profile similarity assessment, evaluation of class replicability, and comparison of merged classes' profiles in both samples. Four robust personality types re-emerged within the Big Five domain closely corresponding with four types identified in recent studies. Three types were extracted from Tellegen's and the HEXACO models. Despite the challenges of interpreting types from Tellegen's model, results demonstrated congruence with previous findings, whereas results for the HEXACO model showed little evidence of class/profile robustness. This exploratory study highlights the importance of personality profiles in personality assessment which could be further investigated with new data sources such as SAPA and advanced statistical tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112957"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last two decades, individual differences have been examined from a person-oriented approach which tends to classify individuals into personality types based on their unique configurations of personality traits. Previous typological studies explored the consistency of personality profiles by varying different methodological factors (e.g., sample characteristics, personality theoretical frameworks, personality assessment methods, and data analysis methods). The aim of the study was to explore the replicability of personality profiles based on three major personality models (Big Five, HEXACO, and Tellegen's model) across two large SAPA (Synthetic Aperture Personality Assessment) datasets. Data analysis included the following steps: model-based clustering, profile similarity assessment, evaluation of class replicability, and comparison of merged classes' profiles in both samples. Four robust personality types re-emerged within the Big Five domain closely corresponding with four types identified in recent studies. Three types were extracted from Tellegen's and the HEXACO models. Despite the challenges of interpreting types from Tellegen's model, results demonstrated congruence with previous findings, whereas results for the HEXACO model showed little evidence of class/profile robustness. This exploratory study highlights the importance of personality profiles in personality assessment which could be further investigated with new data sources such as SAPA and advanced statistical tools.
SAPA数据中的人格特征:一项探索性研究
在过去的二十年里,个体差异已经从一种以人为本的方法进行了研究,这种方法倾向于根据个体独特的人格特征配置将个体划分为不同的人格类型。以往的类型学研究通过不同的方法因素(如样本特征、人格理论框架、人格评估方法和数据分析方法)来探索人格特征的一致性。该研究的目的是探索基于三个主要人格模型(Big Five, HEXACO和Tellegen模型)在两个大型SAPA(合成孔径人格评估)数据集上的人格概况的可复制性。数据分析包括以下步骤:基于模型的聚类、概要相似性评估、类可复制性评估以及两个样本中合并类概要的比较。四种强大的人格类型在五大人格领域中重新出现,与最近研究中确定的四种人格类型密切相关。从Tellegen和HEXACO模型中提取三种类型。尽管从Tellegen的模型中解释类型存在挑战,但结果显示与先前的发现一致,而HEXACO模型的结果显示几乎没有证据表明类别/剖面稳健性。本探索性研究强调了人格特征在人格评估中的重要性,可以通过新的数据源(如SAPA和先进的统计工具)进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信