Towards decarbonisation or lock-in to natural gas? A bottom-up modelling analysis of the energy transition ambiguity in the residential sector by 2050

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Dimitris Papantonis, Vassilis Stavrakas, Dimitra Tzani, Alexandros Flamos
{"title":"Towards decarbonisation or lock-in to natural gas? A bottom-up modelling analysis of the energy transition ambiguity in the residential sector by 2050","authors":"Dimitris Papantonis,&nbsp;Vassilis Stavrakas,&nbsp;Dimitra Tzani,&nbsp;Alexandros Flamos","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While a green transition in the Greek building sector is considered critical towards a secure and resilient energy system by 2050, national policymaking continues to support schemes and investments on the expansion of the natural gas grid in the mainland, viewing natural gas as a transition fuel, especially in the residential sector. In this context, this article uses a bottom-up high-resolution demand-side model to simulate different transition scenarios in the Greek residential sector by 2050, as these are extracted from the current existing policy planning and political decisions, recent amendments currently under public consultation, and relevant national experts’ feedback. Simulation outcomes provide the evolution of the energy mix by 2050, along with the respective economic and environmental implications, for the different scenarios under study. Based on these outcomes, two key findings are derived: first, the existing renovation rate as set by national policymaking is not enough to lead to decarbonisation by 2050. If the goal is to achieve decarbonisation by 2050, then the current annual renovation rate of 1.5% must be updated to 2.5%, while, if a more ambitious goal of achieving decarbonisation by 2040 is to be adopted, the annual renovation rate must be updated to 3.5%. Second, the scenarios that promote electrification and the early phase out of natural gas result in lower costs, at both the national and the household level, and in lower levels of carbon emissions by 2050, implying that the current national reliance on natural gas may result in a missed opportunity of a green and inclusive energy transition, or even worse in a potential lock-in effect. Overall, this study provides critical and actionable insights to inform the development of national planning initiatives and support policymakers in crafting strategies that align with the overarching objectives of decarbonisation, climate neutrality, and energy security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 119235"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424011762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a green transition in the Greek building sector is considered critical towards a secure and resilient energy system by 2050, national policymaking continues to support schemes and investments on the expansion of the natural gas grid in the mainland, viewing natural gas as a transition fuel, especially in the residential sector. In this context, this article uses a bottom-up high-resolution demand-side model to simulate different transition scenarios in the Greek residential sector by 2050, as these are extracted from the current existing policy planning and political decisions, recent amendments currently under public consultation, and relevant national experts’ feedback. Simulation outcomes provide the evolution of the energy mix by 2050, along with the respective economic and environmental implications, for the different scenarios under study. Based on these outcomes, two key findings are derived: first, the existing renovation rate as set by national policymaking is not enough to lead to decarbonisation by 2050. If the goal is to achieve decarbonisation by 2050, then the current annual renovation rate of 1.5% must be updated to 2.5%, while, if a more ambitious goal of achieving decarbonisation by 2040 is to be adopted, the annual renovation rate must be updated to 3.5%. Second, the scenarios that promote electrification and the early phase out of natural gas result in lower costs, at both the national and the household level, and in lower levels of carbon emissions by 2050, implying that the current national reliance on natural gas may result in a missed opportunity of a green and inclusive energy transition, or even worse in a potential lock-in effect. Overall, this study provides critical and actionable insights to inform the development of national planning initiatives and support policymakers in crafting strategies that align with the overarching objectives of decarbonisation, climate neutrality, and energy security.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信