A review on modeling methods and key parameters control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on numerical comparison

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Pei Fu, Zijian Lan, Yisong Chen, Shuo Zhang
{"title":"A review on modeling methods and key parameters control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on numerical comparison","authors":"Pei Fu,&nbsp;Zijian Lan,&nbsp;Yisong Chen,&nbsp;Shuo Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although numerous studies have investigated semi-mechanistic and semi-empirical modeling methods for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) engine systems, the advantages and disadvantages of these modeling methods have rarely been analyzed and summarized. As a result, it is difficult to identify the most suitable models under different conditions. Moreover, there are opportunities to further develop research on controlling the three most critical parameters of the PEMFC engine system-the oxygen excess ratio (OER), stack temperature, and humidity. Thus, a review is presented to develop systematic guidelines for semi-mechanistic and semi-empirical modeling methods and key parameter control studies related to PEMFC engine systems. This paper summarizes all the authoritative modeling methods for the air compressor used in the PEMFC engine system with output power from 60 to 175 kW, and cathode humidifier in the air supply subsystem, ejector and circulation pump in the hydrogen supply subsystem, flow fluid and voltages in the fuel cell stack subsystem, and water pump and radiator in the thermal management subsystem using scientific equations. The advantages and disadvantages of each modeling method are then discussed through numerical comparisons or authoritative opinions. Subsequently, based on the modeling methods, the development and prospects of key parameter control studies for the PEMFC engine system are proposed based on advanced research in recent years. This paper not only makes it more convenient to identify appropriate modeling methods based on different modeling demands, but also highlights development directions for key parameters control research in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 119309"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424012500","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although numerous studies have investigated semi-mechanistic and semi-empirical modeling methods for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) engine systems, the advantages and disadvantages of these modeling methods have rarely been analyzed and summarized. As a result, it is difficult to identify the most suitable models under different conditions. Moreover, there are opportunities to further develop research on controlling the three most critical parameters of the PEMFC engine system-the oxygen excess ratio (OER), stack temperature, and humidity. Thus, a review is presented to develop systematic guidelines for semi-mechanistic and semi-empirical modeling methods and key parameter control studies related to PEMFC engine systems. This paper summarizes all the authoritative modeling methods for the air compressor used in the PEMFC engine system with output power from 60 to 175 kW, and cathode humidifier in the air supply subsystem, ejector and circulation pump in the hydrogen supply subsystem, flow fluid and voltages in the fuel cell stack subsystem, and water pump and radiator in the thermal management subsystem using scientific equations. The advantages and disadvantages of each modeling method are then discussed through numerical comparisons or authoritative opinions. Subsequently, based on the modeling methods, the development and prospects of key parameter control studies for the PEMFC engine system are proposed based on advanced research in recent years. This paper not only makes it more convenient to identify appropriate modeling methods based on different modeling demands, but also highlights development directions for key parameters control research in the future.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信