How fear conditioning affects the visuocortical processing of context cues in humans. Evidence from steady state visual evoked responses

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alejandro Santos-Mayo , Stephan Moratti
{"title":"How fear conditioning affects the visuocortical processing of context cues in humans. Evidence from steady state visual evoked responses","authors":"Alejandro Santos-Mayo ,&nbsp;Stephan Moratti","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has focused on how different environments modulate fear learning and the accompanying prioritization of acquired threat cues in sensory cortices. Here, we focus on the other side of the coin and show how the acquisition of threat relevance influences the sensory processing of the environment and an associated context cue. Thereby, we observed that spatial suppression surrounding the focus of threat relevant cues extended by threat learning. By recording frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked fields (ssVEFs) from 35 healthy participants using Magnetoencephalography (MEG), we replicate earlier findings that centrally presented acquired threat-relevant cues (CS+) evoke greater ssVEF responses, whereas visuocortical engagement during the processing of threat-irrelevant cues (CS-) is inhibited. Critically, as predicted by early computational models of threat learning such as the Rescorla-Wagner model, ssVEF responses to an inter-trial peripheral background flicker (context cue), when no CS was shown, increased linearly during learning. In contrast, visuocortical engagement in the early-tier visual cortex during the processing of the background flicker was strongly reduced during CS presentation in the last learning block. This effect was observed during maximal CS+ and CS- discrimination. However, in more anterior ventral visual cortex, the inhibition of oscillatory responses of the context cue occurred only during CS + trials, whereas during CS- trials, background ssVEF responses were increased. These results are in line with the notion that attentional resources are reallocated flexibly between cues of different threat relevance and that the spatial extension of center surround neuronal competition can be modulated by threat learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"183 ","pages":"Pages 21-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224003046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has focused on how different environments modulate fear learning and the accompanying prioritization of acquired threat cues in sensory cortices. Here, we focus on the other side of the coin and show how the acquisition of threat relevance influences the sensory processing of the environment and an associated context cue. Thereby, we observed that spatial suppression surrounding the focus of threat relevant cues extended by threat learning. By recording frequency-tagged steady-state visual evoked fields (ssVEFs) from 35 healthy participants using Magnetoencephalography (MEG), we replicate earlier findings that centrally presented acquired threat-relevant cues (CS+) evoke greater ssVEF responses, whereas visuocortical engagement during the processing of threat-irrelevant cues (CS-) is inhibited. Critically, as predicted by early computational models of threat learning such as the Rescorla-Wagner model, ssVEF responses to an inter-trial peripheral background flicker (context cue), when no CS was shown, increased linearly during learning. In contrast, visuocortical engagement in the early-tier visual cortex during the processing of the background flicker was strongly reduced during CS presentation in the last learning block. This effect was observed during maximal CS+ and CS- discrimination. However, in more anterior ventral visual cortex, the inhibition of oscillatory responses of the context cue occurred only during CS + trials, whereas during CS- trials, background ssVEF responses were increased. These results are in line with the notion that attentional resources are reallocated flexibly between cues of different threat relevance and that the spatial extension of center surround neuronal competition can be modulated by threat learning.
恐惧条件反射如何影响人类对情境线索的视觉皮质处理。稳态视觉诱发反应的证据
以前的研究主要集中在不同的环境如何调节恐惧学习和伴随的获得性威胁线索在感觉皮层中的优先级。在这里,我们关注硬币的另一面,并展示了威胁相关性的习得如何影响环境和相关上下文线索的感觉加工。因此,我们观察到威胁学习扩展了威胁相关线索焦点周围的空间抑制。通过使用脑磁图(MEG)记录35名健康参与者的频率标记稳态视觉诱发场(ssVEF),我们重复了先前的发现,即集中呈现获得性威胁相关线索(CS+)会引起更大的ssVEF反应,而在处理威胁无关线索(CS-)时,视觉皮层的参与受到抑制。关键的是,正如Rescorla-Wagner模型等早期威胁学习计算模型所预测的那样,当没有CS显示时,ssVEF对试验间周边背景闪烁(上下文提示)的反应在学习过程中呈线性增加。相比之下,在最后一个学习块的CS呈现过程中,在处理背景闪烁过程中,早期视觉皮层的参与明显减少。这种效应在最大CS+和最大CS-辨别时均有观察。然而,在更多的前腹侧视觉皮层中,背景线索振荡反应的抑制仅在CS +试验中发生,而在CS-试验中,背景线索振荡反应增加。这些结果与注意资源在不同威胁相关性线索之间的灵活重新分配以及威胁学习可以调节中心周围神经元竞争的空间扩展的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信