Translational assessment of anhedonia components: Significant associations between reward anticipation measured via behavioural task performance, daily smartphone reports, and general anhedonia questionnaires

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
C.E. Parsons , L. Tollånes , M. Cella , C.R. Hirsch , K.S. Young
{"title":"Translational assessment of anhedonia components: Significant associations between reward anticipation measured via behavioural task performance, daily smartphone reports, and general anhedonia questionnaires","authors":"C.E. Parsons ,&nbsp;L. Tollånes ,&nbsp;M. Cella ,&nbsp;C.R. Hirsch ,&nbsp;K.S. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anhedonia, a reduction in pleasure in previously enjoyed activities, is a hallmark feature of depression and is also of transdiagnostic relevance to many psychiatric disorders. Treatment and measurement of anhedonia are significant challenges. We examine anhedonia components, combining experimental training, with multimodal anhedonia assessment, comprising standard questionnaire instruments, a widely-used behavioural task, and daily reports of reward experience. Seventy-eight adults (74.4% female) completed both positive and negative cognitive bias modification training, a laboratory-based behavioural measure of reward anticipation and motivation, the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), and seven days of experience sampling via their smartphones.</div><div>We found no evidence that cognitive bias modification training affected choices to engage in the high-effort trials on the EEfRT task, theorised to reflect reward anticipation. We also did not find the expected associations between baseline measures of anhedonia and reward sensitivity and response to training. Behavioural performance on the low probability EEfRT trials indicating higher reward anticipation was significantly associated with daily reports of anticipated reward. Daily reported reward anticipation and consumption were also associated with the questionnaire measure of anhedonia. Our findings demonstrate that traditional anhedonia questionnaire measures, and a laboratory-based measure of an anhedonia component, can translate to reported experiences of reward in real-world contexts. We demonstrate the specificity of associations between the laboratory measure, designed to measure reward anticipation and not consumption, and real-world reports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 104654"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724001815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anhedonia, a reduction in pleasure in previously enjoyed activities, is a hallmark feature of depression and is also of transdiagnostic relevance to many psychiatric disorders. Treatment and measurement of anhedonia are significant challenges. We examine anhedonia components, combining experimental training, with multimodal anhedonia assessment, comprising standard questionnaire instruments, a widely-used behavioural task, and daily reports of reward experience. Seventy-eight adults (74.4% female) completed both positive and negative cognitive bias modification training, a laboratory-based behavioural measure of reward anticipation and motivation, the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), and seven days of experience sampling via their smartphones.
We found no evidence that cognitive bias modification training affected choices to engage in the high-effort trials on the EEfRT task, theorised to reflect reward anticipation. We also did not find the expected associations between baseline measures of anhedonia and reward sensitivity and response to training. Behavioural performance on the low probability EEfRT trials indicating higher reward anticipation was significantly associated with daily reports of anticipated reward. Daily reported reward anticipation and consumption were also associated with the questionnaire measure of anhedonia. Our findings demonstrate that traditional anhedonia questionnaire measures, and a laboratory-based measure of an anhedonia component, can translate to reported experiences of reward in real-world contexts. We demonstrate the specificity of associations between the laboratory measure, designed to measure reward anticipation and not consumption, and real-world reports.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信