The application of analytical hierarchy process to assess adaptation strategies for flood and landslides risks: A case study of a multi-risk area community

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Diana Caporale , Anna Rinaldi
{"title":"The application of analytical hierarchy process to assess adaptation strategies for flood and landslides risks: A case study of a multi-risk area community","authors":"Diana Caporale ,&nbsp;Anna Rinaldi","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing frequency of flood-related emergencies has heightened discussions on climate adaptation and risk management. Despite investments in infrastructure, early warning systems, urban planning improvements, and awareness initiatives, sustained attention and action are essential. The efficacy of preventive measures relies heavily on local community decisions and their cooperation with authorities, impacting the entire risk management cycle. This study investigates the factors influencing flood and landslide adaptation strategies and their perception by citizens in vulnerable areas, aiming to identify key variables that shape citizen behaviour for effective planning and management of adaptation actions. Focusing on Ischia Island, Italy, a multi-risk area, the study applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in focus groups to achieve three objectives: i) Highlight the critical role of citizen perceptions in forming adaptation strategies, emphasizing the need for cohesive efforts among policymakers, experts, and communities to enhance resilience. ii) Examine residents' views on flood and landslide risks to understand local concerns and vulnerabilities. iii) Use multi-criteria analysis to evaluate the importance of factors shaping adaptation strategies, providing a systematic framework for decision-making in disaster risk management. Findings reveal an optimism bias in respondents' perceptions of their home security despite recognizing the area's vulnerability and mistrust in authorities. Environmental and social factors are deemed most important, with environmental strategies focused on harm reduction and local environment enhancement, and social strategies emphasizing information dissemination and mortality reduction. This research offers valuable insights into community perceptions and factors influencing adaptation strategies for flood and landslide risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing frequency of flood-related emergencies has heightened discussions on climate adaptation and risk management. Despite investments in infrastructure, early warning systems, urban planning improvements, and awareness initiatives, sustained attention and action are essential. The efficacy of preventive measures relies heavily on local community decisions and their cooperation with authorities, impacting the entire risk management cycle. This study investigates the factors influencing flood and landslide adaptation strategies and their perception by citizens in vulnerable areas, aiming to identify key variables that shape citizen behaviour for effective planning and management of adaptation actions. Focusing on Ischia Island, Italy, a multi-risk area, the study applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in focus groups to achieve three objectives: i) Highlight the critical role of citizen perceptions in forming adaptation strategies, emphasizing the need for cohesive efforts among policymakers, experts, and communities to enhance resilience. ii) Examine residents' views on flood and landslide risks to understand local concerns and vulnerabilities. iii) Use multi-criteria analysis to evaluate the importance of factors shaping adaptation strategies, providing a systematic framework for decision-making in disaster risk management. Findings reveal an optimism bias in respondents' perceptions of their home security despite recognizing the area's vulnerability and mistrust in authorities. Environmental and social factors are deemed most important, with environmental strategies focused on harm reduction and local environment enhancement, and social strategies emphasizing information dissemination and mortality reduction. This research offers valuable insights into community perceptions and factors influencing adaptation strategies for flood and landslide risks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信