Sofia Kasradze , Giorgi Lomidze , Nino Gogatishvili , Salome Mgeliashvili , Tamara Antia , Josemir W Sander
{"title":"Revisiting knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards epilepsy after a decade of interventions: The case of Tbilisi, Georgia","authors":"Sofia Kasradze , Giorgi Lomidze , Nino Gogatishvili , Salome Mgeliashvili , Tamara Antia , Josemir W Sander","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>One of the most significant challenges faced by people with epilepsy is the stigma imposed by the broader community. We aim to assess the dynamics of stigma and the level of misconceptions towards individuals with epilepsy by comparing two studies conducted decades apart.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Awareness-raising campaigns and professional skill development activities were conducted. We utilised a Georgian-adapted structured questionnaire and the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE) questionnaire, which had previously been validated in Georgian. A cross-sectional study was conducted. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to develop a predictive model for stigma perception. To compare the two studies, we used the Chi-squared test to examine differences in proportions between the two populations, including the 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the difference in proportions. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1,146 participants, 502 (43.8%) were female, and 207 (18.1%) had a medical education. Higher levels of stigma were observed more frequently among individuals without a medical background. Participants who perceived epilepsy as a psychiatric disorder, a hereditary condition, or a congenital disability exhibited higher levels of stigma. Comparisons between the two studies reveal a significant decrease in the number of individuals who would oppose their child marrying or playing with someone who has epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Respondents with medical backgrounds were less likely to express stigma and misconceptions. A comparison of the two studies indicates a statistically significant improvement over the past decade, likely to be partly attributable to regular awareness-raising campaigns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 110166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024005481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
One of the most significant challenges faced by people with epilepsy is the stigma imposed by the broader community. We aim to assess the dynamics of stigma and the level of misconceptions towards individuals with epilepsy by comparing two studies conducted decades apart.
Methods
Awareness-raising campaigns and professional skill development activities were conducted. We utilised a Georgian-adapted structured questionnaire and the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE) questionnaire, which had previously been validated in Georgian. A cross-sectional study was conducted. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to develop a predictive model for stigma perception. To compare the two studies, we used the Chi-squared test to examine differences in proportions between the two populations, including the 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the difference in proportions. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Of the 1,146 participants, 502 (43.8%) were female, and 207 (18.1%) had a medical education. Higher levels of stigma were observed more frequently among individuals without a medical background. Participants who perceived epilepsy as a psychiatric disorder, a hereditary condition, or a congenital disability exhibited higher levels of stigma. Comparisons between the two studies reveal a significant decrease in the number of individuals who would oppose their child marrying or playing with someone who has epilepsy.
Conclusions
Respondents with medical backgrounds were less likely to express stigma and misconceptions. A comparison of the two studies indicates a statistically significant improvement over the past decade, likely to be partly attributable to regular awareness-raising campaigns.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.