General Practice Sleep Scale – The “GPSS” – A proposed new tool for use in General Practice for risk assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Timothy Howarth , Joe Hedger , Winnie Chen , Himanshu Garg , Subash S. Heraganahally
{"title":"General Practice Sleep Scale – The “GPSS” – A proposed new tool for use in General Practice for risk assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","authors":"Timothy Howarth ,&nbsp;Joe Hedger ,&nbsp;Winnie Chen ,&nbsp;Himanshu Garg ,&nbsp;Subash S. Heraganahally","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This pilot study investigated a new simplified OSA screening tool that could be used in primary care/GP settings – the “GPSS” tool – “General Practice Sleep Scale” and compared against common existing OSA screening tools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A convenience sample of patients attending the respiratory and sleep clinic in the Northern Territory of Australia were included if they completed the GPSS prior to undergoing a diagnostic polysomnography. The GPSS contained 9 questions to provide information on: sex, age, body mass index, neck circumference, snoring, witnessed apnoeas, morning tiredness, daytime sleepiness and presence of hypertension/diabetes/heart disease/depression. Presence of OSA was defined as an apnoea-hypopnoea index of ≥15/hour. The GPSS scoring was developed via log odds of regression predictions for each GPSS question upon OSA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>159 patients (65 % male, median age 45 years) were enrolled. A minimum score of 1 was assigned to GPSS questions, up to 5 for the strongest predictor (neck circumference). The median total GPSS score was 13 (IQR 9, 16) (maximum 22) and correlated strongly with OSA (AUC 0.812 (95 % CI 0.744, 0.881)). Categorised into low (0–7), moderate (8–13) or high risk (&gt;13), a moderate or severe score had sensitivity 100, specificity 34.9 %. The GPSS significantly outperformed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin questionnaire and OSA-50, and was comparable but slightly improved against the STOP-Bang.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed GPSS tool could be of use in general practice settings. Further prospective research is warranted to test the applicability and adaptability of the GPSS tool in wider population settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 168-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724005252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This pilot study investigated a new simplified OSA screening tool that could be used in primary care/GP settings – the “GPSS” tool – “General Practice Sleep Scale” and compared against common existing OSA screening tools.

Methods

A convenience sample of patients attending the respiratory and sleep clinic in the Northern Territory of Australia were included if they completed the GPSS prior to undergoing a diagnostic polysomnography. The GPSS contained 9 questions to provide information on: sex, age, body mass index, neck circumference, snoring, witnessed apnoeas, morning tiredness, daytime sleepiness and presence of hypertension/diabetes/heart disease/depression. Presence of OSA was defined as an apnoea-hypopnoea index of ≥15/hour. The GPSS scoring was developed via log odds of regression predictions for each GPSS question upon OSA.

Results

159 patients (65 % male, median age 45 years) were enrolled. A minimum score of 1 was assigned to GPSS questions, up to 5 for the strongest predictor (neck circumference). The median total GPSS score was 13 (IQR 9, 16) (maximum 22) and correlated strongly with OSA (AUC 0.812 (95 % CI 0.744, 0.881)). Categorised into low (0–7), moderate (8–13) or high risk (>13), a moderate or severe score had sensitivity 100, specificity 34.9 %. The GPSS significantly outperformed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin questionnaire and OSA-50, and was comparable but slightly improved against the STOP-Bang.

Conclusions

The proposed GPSS tool could be of use in general practice settings. Further prospective research is warranted to test the applicability and adaptability of the GPSS tool in wider population settings.
全科医生睡眠量表-“GPSS”-建议在全科医生中用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停风险评估的新工具
本试点研究调查了一种新的简化的OSA筛查工具,可用于初级保健/全科医生设置-“GPSS”工具-“全科医生睡眠量表”,并与常见的现有OSA筛查工具进行比较。方法选取在澳大利亚北部地区呼吸与睡眠诊所就诊的患者作为方便样本,如果他们在接受诊断性多导睡眠描记仪之前完成了GPSS。GPSS包含9个问题,提供的信息包括:性别、年龄、体重指数、颈围、打鼾、目击呼吸暂停、早晨疲劳、白天嗜睡以及高血压/糖尿病/心脏病/抑郁症的存在。OSA定义为呼吸暂停-低通气指数≥15/小时。GPSS评分是通过对OSA的每个GPSS问题的回归预测的对数赔率来开发的。结果纳入159例患者(65%为男性,中位年龄45岁)。GPSS问题的最低得分为1分,最强预测因子(颈围)最高得分为5分。GPSS总评分中位数为13 (IQR为9,16)(最高为22),与OSA密切相关(AUC为0.812 (95% CI为0.744,0.881)。分为低(0-7)、中度(8-13)和高风险(>13),中度和重度评分的敏感性为100,特异性为34.9%。GPSS的表现明显优于爱普沃斯嗜睡量表、柏林问卷和OSA-50,与STOP-Bang的表现相当,但略有改善。结论所建立的GPSS工具可用于一般临床环境。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来测试GPSS工具在更广泛人群环境中的适用性和适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信