Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis

Q3 Psychology
Simon Ladwig , Matthias Volz , Julia Haupt , Anya Pedersen , Katja Werheid
{"title":"Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis","authors":"Simon Ladwig ,&nbsp;Matthias Volz ,&nbsp;Julia Haupt ,&nbsp;Anya Pedersen ,&nbsp;Katja Werheid","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), depressive symptoms, disability, and social support show complex interdependences after stroke, which cannot be sufficiently depicted by commonly used uni- or bivariate analyses. Applying a network analysis, we aim to disentangle these multivariate relationships and deduce meaningful starting points for interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Stroke survivors (<em>N</em> = 202) were recruited from two inpatient rehabilitation clinics. Participants self-reported mental and physical HRQOL, depressive symptoms, disability, and social support. We computed a partial correlation network and included these five variables as separate nodes. We estimated edge weights, node centrality (expected influence), node predictability, and clusters. Bootstrap methods were applied to assess network stability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Depressive symptoms and mental HRQOL were the most central and interconnected nodes in the network. Depressive symptoms built its own cluster. Social support showed a high association with depressive symptoms. Disability had no significant associations with other nodes in the network. Physical HRQOL was significantly connected only to its mental equivalent.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The cross-sectional design limits the findings to the setting of inpatient rehabilitation few weeks after stroke and allows no longitudinal inferences. The relatively small sample size and varying metrics of applied measures are counterbalanced by a high stability of estimations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Depression and social support show stronger associations with HRQOL than physical aspects during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. This underscores the significance of mental aspects shortly after stroke. Development and implementation of early interventions targeting depressive symptoms and social support may sustainably mitigate the burden on HRQOL after stroke.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100855"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), depressive symptoms, disability, and social support show complex interdependences after stroke, which cannot be sufficiently depicted by commonly used uni- or bivariate analyses. Applying a network analysis, we aim to disentangle these multivariate relationships and deduce meaningful starting points for interventions.

Methods

Stroke survivors (N = 202) were recruited from two inpatient rehabilitation clinics. Participants self-reported mental and physical HRQOL, depressive symptoms, disability, and social support. We computed a partial correlation network and included these five variables as separate nodes. We estimated edge weights, node centrality (expected influence), node predictability, and clusters. Bootstrap methods were applied to assess network stability.

Results

Depressive symptoms and mental HRQOL were the most central and interconnected nodes in the network. Depressive symptoms built its own cluster. Social support showed a high association with depressive symptoms. Disability had no significant associations with other nodes in the network. Physical HRQOL was significantly connected only to its mental equivalent.

Limitations

The cross-sectional design limits the findings to the setting of inpatient rehabilitation few weeks after stroke and allows no longitudinal inferences. The relatively small sample size and varying metrics of applied measures are counterbalanced by a high stability of estimations.

Conclusions

Depression and social support show stronger associations with HRQOL than physical aspects during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. This underscores the significance of mental aspects shortly after stroke. Development and implementation of early interventions targeting depressive symptoms and social support may sustainably mitigate the burden on HRQOL after stroke.
脑卒中后健康相关生活质量、抑郁症状、残疾和社会支持的关系:网络分析
背景:卒中后与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)、抑郁症状、残疾和社会支持表现出复杂的相互依赖性,这不能通过常用的单变量或双变量分析来充分描述。应用网络分析,我们的目标是解开这些多元关系,并推断出有意义的干预起点。方法从两个住院康复诊所招募脑卒中幸存者(N = 202)。参与者自我报告精神和身体HRQOL、抑郁症状、残疾和社会支持。我们计算了一个部分相关网络,并将这五个变量作为单独的节点。我们估计了边缘权重、节点中心性(预期影响)、节点可预测性和聚类。采用自举法评估网络稳定性。结果抑郁症状和精神HRQOL是网络中最中心和相互联系的节点。抑郁症状形成了自己的集群。社会支持与抑郁症状高度相关。残疾与网络中的其他节点没有显著关联。生理上的HRQOL只与精神上的HRQOL有显著的联系。局限性:横断面设计将研究结果限制在中风后几周住院康复的情况下,不允许纵向推论。相对较小的样本量和应用度量的变化度量被估计的高稳定性所抵消。结论在脑卒中住院康复过程中,抑郁和社会支持对患者HRQOL的影响大于生理方面。这强调了中风后不久精神方面的重要性。针对抑郁症状和社会支持的早期干预措施的制定和实施可能会持续减轻中风后HRQOL的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信