Comparison of total phenolic content in organic and conventional carrot under different drying conditions using non-destructive analysis techniques

IF 4.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Aysel Arslan , Nafiz Çeliktaş , Yurtsever Soysal , Muharrem Keskin
{"title":"Comparison of total phenolic content in organic and conventional carrot under different drying conditions using non-destructive analysis techniques","authors":"Aysel Arslan ,&nbsp;Nafiz Çeliktaş ,&nbsp;Yurtsever Soysal ,&nbsp;Muharrem Keskin","doi":"10.1016/j.microc.2024.112279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current evidence indicates that the higher nutritional value of organic foods, compared to their conventional counterparts, significantly impacts consumer demand. However, the application of thermal processes during processing may lead to a loss of nutritional values, including total phenolics and antioxidants, thereby failing to meet consumer expectations. Phenolics, known as some of the most potent natural antioxidants and are typically assessed through biochemical tests based on the concentration and reactivity of antioxidant compounds. However, the extraction methods can affect the accuracy of phenolic content measurement. In this study, the total phenolic (TP) (mg/100 g) capacity of fresh, hot air (HA)-dried, and intermittent microwave (IMW)-dried organic and conventional black carrots were compared, and the detectability of these compounds using a colorimeter and FT-NIRS was evaluated. PLSR models developed for estimating the TP content using FT-NIRS resulted in successful outcomes (IMW: R<sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.78, RMSEP = 51.4 mg/100 g; HA: R<sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.70, RMSEP = 63.0 mg/100 g). The highest prediction accuracy was achieved with drying treatments at 300 W (R<sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.95, RMSEP = 5.1 mg/100 g) and 450 W (R<sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.83, RMSEP = 50.7 mg/100 g), as well as at 80 °C (R<sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.90, RMSEP = 21.0 mg/100 g). The drying methods significantly influenced the TP content and the accuracy of TP prediction in samples. Additionally, organic carrots contained a higher level of total phenolic compared to conventional.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":391,"journal":{"name":"Microchemical Journal","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 112279"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microchemical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X24023919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that the higher nutritional value of organic foods, compared to their conventional counterparts, significantly impacts consumer demand. However, the application of thermal processes during processing may lead to a loss of nutritional values, including total phenolics and antioxidants, thereby failing to meet consumer expectations. Phenolics, known as some of the most potent natural antioxidants and are typically assessed through biochemical tests based on the concentration and reactivity of antioxidant compounds. However, the extraction methods can affect the accuracy of phenolic content measurement. In this study, the total phenolic (TP) (mg/100 g) capacity of fresh, hot air (HA)-dried, and intermittent microwave (IMW)-dried organic and conventional black carrots were compared, and the detectability of these compounds using a colorimeter and FT-NIRS was evaluated. PLSR models developed for estimating the TP content using FT-NIRS resulted in successful outcomes (IMW: R2val = 0.78, RMSEP = 51.4 mg/100 g; HA: R2val = 0.70, RMSEP = 63.0 mg/100 g). The highest prediction accuracy was achieved with drying treatments at 300 W (R2val = 0.95, RMSEP = 5.1 mg/100 g) and 450 W (R2val = 0.83, RMSEP = 50.7 mg/100 g), as well as at 80 °C (R2val = 0.90, RMSEP = 21.0 mg/100 g). The drying methods significantly influenced the TP content and the accuracy of TP prediction in samples. Additionally, organic carrots contained a higher level of total phenolic compared to conventional.

Abstract Image

用无损分析技术比较不同干燥条件下有机胡萝卜和常规胡萝卜的总酚含量
目前的证据表明,与传统食品相比,有机食品的营养价值更高,这极大地影响了消费者的需求。然而,在加工过程中应用热处理可能导致营养价值的损失,包括总酚类物质和抗氧化剂,从而无法满足消费者的期望。酚类物质被认为是一些最有效的天然抗氧化剂,通常通过基于抗氧化剂化合物的浓度和反应性的生化测试来评估。然而,提取方法会影响测定酚含量的准确性。本研究比较了新鲜、热空气(HA)干燥和间歇微波(IMW)干燥有机黑胡萝卜和常规黑胡萝卜的总酚(TP) (mg/ 100g)容量,并利用比色仪和FT-NIRS对这些化合物的可检出性进行了评价。利用FT-NIRS估计TP含量的PLSR模型取得了成功的结果(IMW: R2val = 0.78, RMSEP = 51.4 mg/100 g;在300 W (R2val = 0.95, RMSEP = 5.1 mg/100 g)、450 W (R2val = 0.83, RMSEP = 50.7 mg/100 g)和80°C (R2val = 0.90, RMSEP = 21.0 mg/100 g)条件下,样品中TP含量和预测精度受到不同干燥方式的显著影响。此外,有机胡萝卜比传统胡萝卜含有更高水平的总酚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microchemical Journal
Microchemical Journal 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1131
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Microchemical Journal is a peer reviewed journal devoted to all aspects and phases of analytical chemistry and chemical analysis. The Microchemical Journal publishes articles which are at the forefront of modern analytical chemistry and cover innovations in the techniques to the finest possible limits. This includes fundamental aspects, instrumentation, new developments, innovative and novel methods and applications including environmental and clinical field. Traditional classical analytical methods such as spectrophotometry and titrimetry as well as established instrumentation methods such as flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, gas chromatography, and modified glassy or carbon electrode electrochemical methods will be considered, provided they show significant improvements and novelty compared to the established methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信