Controlled release urea combined with normal urea maintains the N balance and improves the environmental and economic benefits in wheat–maize multiple cropping

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shiju Liu , Yongqi Li , Yaru Zhang , Lijin Chen , Tao Wang , Hongxia Li , Yuncheng Liao , Yajun Li , Guangxin Zhang , Juan Han
{"title":"Controlled release urea combined with normal urea maintains the N balance and improves the environmental and economic benefits in wheat–maize multiple cropping","authors":"Shiju Liu ,&nbsp;Yongqi Li ,&nbsp;Yaru Zhang ,&nbsp;Lijin Chen ,&nbsp;Tao Wang ,&nbsp;Hongxia Li ,&nbsp;Yuncheng Liao ,&nbsp;Yajun Li ,&nbsp;Guangxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Juan Han","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Controlled release urea combined with normal urea (CRUNU) can potentially improve crop yields and reduce the associated environmental risk. However, the effects of CRUNU on farmland environmental benefits and the agroecosystem nitrogen (N) balance have not been evaluated in the winter wheat–summer maize multiple cropping system in northwest China, and few studies have quantified the impacts of CRUNU on N losses with this cropping system based on life cycle assessment. Therefore, we performed a field experiment for two years during 2020–2022 with two types of N fertilizer (normal urea (NU) and CRUNU) and at three N application rates (low: 135 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>, medium: 180 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>, and high: 225 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup>) at Caoxinzhuang experimental farm to comprehensively evaluate the effects of CRUNU on the agronomic, N balance, environmental, and economic benefits in winter wheat–summer maize cropping. Compared with NU, CRUNU helped to synchronize the N supply and demand for wheat and maize, and under all three N application rates, the annual average grain yield and grain N uptake increased with CRUNU, as well as reducing the volatilization of NH<sub>3</sub> by 16.69 %, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 25.16 %, and N losses due to nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) leaching by 44.23–61.65 %, thereby maintaining the total N storage. Considering both the N input and output, CRUNU achieved a lower N surplus than NU and maintained the N balance in the farmland ecosystem. In addition, CRUNU significantly reduced the reactive N losses at the three N application rates to decrease the N footprint (NF) by 25.48–42.85 %, where CRUNU obtained the lowest NF at the medium N application rate. More importantly, the benefits of CRUNU for increasing the grain yield at different N application rates offset the higher agricultural input costs and reduced the environmental costs due to N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization, and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> leaching losses, so the net benefits increased by 23.14–29.25 %. Furthermore, the net benefits under CRUNU did not differ significantly at the medium and high N application rates. Therefore, we recommend CRUNU application at the medium rate as an effective strategy for improving the N balance, environmental effects, and economic benefits in wheat–maize multiple cropping systems</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 127446"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124003678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlled release urea combined with normal urea (CRUNU) can potentially improve crop yields and reduce the associated environmental risk. However, the effects of CRUNU on farmland environmental benefits and the agroecosystem nitrogen (N) balance have not been evaluated in the winter wheat–summer maize multiple cropping system in northwest China, and few studies have quantified the impacts of CRUNU on N losses with this cropping system based on life cycle assessment. Therefore, we performed a field experiment for two years during 2020–2022 with two types of N fertilizer (normal urea (NU) and CRUNU) and at three N application rates (low: 135 kg N ha–1, medium: 180 kg N ha–1, and high: 225 kg N ha–1) at Caoxinzhuang experimental farm to comprehensively evaluate the effects of CRUNU on the agronomic, N balance, environmental, and economic benefits in winter wheat–summer maize cropping. Compared with NU, CRUNU helped to synchronize the N supply and demand for wheat and maize, and under all three N application rates, the annual average grain yield and grain N uptake increased with CRUNU, as well as reducing the volatilization of NH3 by 16.69 %, N2O emissions by 25.16 %, and N losses due to nitrate (NO3) leaching by 44.23–61.65 %, thereby maintaining the total N storage. Considering both the N input and output, CRUNU achieved a lower N surplus than NU and maintained the N balance in the farmland ecosystem. In addition, CRUNU significantly reduced the reactive N losses at the three N application rates to decrease the N footprint (NF) by 25.48–42.85 %, where CRUNU obtained the lowest NF at the medium N application rate. More importantly, the benefits of CRUNU for increasing the grain yield at different N application rates offset the higher agricultural input costs and reduced the environmental costs due to N2O emissions, NH3 volatilization, and NO3 leaching losses, so the net benefits increased by 23.14–29.25 %. Furthermore, the net benefits under CRUNU did not differ significantly at the medium and high N application rates. Therefore, we recommend CRUNU application at the medium rate as an effective strategy for improving the N balance, environmental effects, and economic benefits in wheat–maize multiple cropping systems
控释尿素与常规尿素配施可维持小麦-玉米复作氮素平衡,提高环境效益和经济效益
控释尿素与普通尿素(CRUNU)结合使用,可以潜在地提高作物产量并降低相关的环境风险。然而,在西北地区冬小麦-夏玉米复作制度下,尚未对CRUNU对农田环境效益和农业生态系统氮素平衡的影响进行评价,也很少有基于生命周期评价的研究量化了CRUNU对该制度下氮素损失的影响。为此,本研究于2020-2022年在草新庄试验农场进行了为期2年的2种氮肥(普通尿素和CRUNU)和3种施氮量(低:135 kg N ha-1,中:180 kg N ha-1,高:225 kg N ha-1)的田间试验,以综合评价CRUNU对冬小麦-夏玉米种植农艺、氮平衡、环境和经济效益的影响。与NU相比,CRUNU有助于同步小麦和玉米的氮供需,在3种施氮量下,谷物年平均产量和氮素吸收率均随CRUNU的增加而增加,NH3挥发减少16.69 %,N2O排放减少25.16 %,硝态氮(NO3 -)淋失减少44.23 ~ 61.65 %,从而维持了总氮储量。综合考虑氮素的投入和产出,CRUNU比NU实现了更低的氮素剩余,维持了农田生态系统的氮素平衡。此外,在3个施氮量下,CRUNU显著降低了活性氮损失,使氮足迹(NF)降低25.48 ~ 42.85 %,其中中等施氮量下,CRUNU的NF最低。更重要的是,不同施氮量下,CRUNU提高粮食产量的效益抵消了较高的农业投入成本,降低了因N2O排放、NH3挥发和NO3 -淋失造成的环境成本,净效益提高23.14-29.25 %。此外,在中施氮量和高施氮量下,在CRUNU下的净效益没有显著差异。因此,我们建议在小麦-玉米复作制度下,中量施用CRUNU作为改善氮素平衡、环境效应和经济效益的有效策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信