Ethics - A matter of principle?Part 2: Rationality, ends, and the levels of moral discourse.

The Ulster medical journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26
Michael Trimble
{"title":"Ethics - A matter of principle?Part 2: Rationality, ends, and the levels of moral discourse.","authors":"Michael Trimble","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discussion of bioethical issues using four principles approach proposed by Beauchamp and Childress is now standard practice in the UK. An earlier paper documented the history of principlism before considering its impact and reviewing some criticisms of the approach. This paper will examine some of the philosophical difficulties in greater depth. A particular concern is that principlism leads to <i>thin</i> debate with consideration of means without due concern regarding their intended ends.</p>","PeriodicalId":94250,"journal":{"name":"The Ulster medical journal","volume":"93 3","pages":"127-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11591212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ulster medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discussion of bioethical issues using four principles approach proposed by Beauchamp and Childress is now standard practice in the UK. An earlier paper documented the history of principlism before considering its impact and reviewing some criticisms of the approach. This paper will examine some of the philosophical difficulties in greater depth. A particular concern is that principlism leads to thin debate with consideration of means without due concern regarding their intended ends.

道德--原则问题?第 2 部分:理性、目的和道德论述的层次。
在英国,使用博尚普和柴尔德里斯提出的四项原则讨论生物伦理问题已成为标准做法。早先的一篇论文记录了原则主义的历史,然后探讨了其影响并回顾了对这种方法的一些批评。本文将更深入地探讨其中的一些哲学难题。其中一个特别值得关注的问题是,原则主义会导致只考虑手段而不充分考虑其预期目的的单薄辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信