Effect of Central Line Duration and Other Risk Factors on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Severe Adult Burns Patients at a Large Tertiary Referral Burns Centre: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alexandra Miller, Elizabeth Vujcich, Jason Brown
{"title":"Effect of Central Line Duration and Other Risk Factors on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Severe Adult Burns Patients at a Large Tertiary Referral Burns Centre: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.","authors":"Alexandra Miller, Elizabeth Vujcich, Jason Brown","doi":"10.3390/ebj3010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CLABSI with a positive catheter tip culture, CRBSI) are preventable causes of morbidity and mortality for severe adult burns patients. Routine central line changes as a CLABSI prevention strategy in burns patients is controversial due to the paucity of evidence to guide the appropriate timing of line changes. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by investigating risk factors associated with central line sepsis, including the duration of central line insertion, in a population of severe adult burns patients (burns involving ≥20% total body surface area (TBSA)) admitted to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Intensive Care Unit over five years (2015-2019 inclusive). On multivariate analysis, central line duration and burn TBSA were identified as independent risk factors for CLABSI, with central line duration the most significant predictor (<i>p</i> = 0.0008; OR 1.177, 95% CI 1.072-1.299). No risk factor independently predicted CRBSI. CLABSI detection occurred a median of 8.5 days (IQR 6.0-11.0) post central line insertion. These findings suggest further research to assess the efficacy of routine line changes prior to the at-risk period of 6-11 days post central line insertion in reducing CLABSI in severe adult burns patients may be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"18-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CLABSI with a positive catheter tip culture, CRBSI) are preventable causes of morbidity and mortality for severe adult burns patients. Routine central line changes as a CLABSI prevention strategy in burns patients is controversial due to the paucity of evidence to guide the appropriate timing of line changes. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by investigating risk factors associated with central line sepsis, including the duration of central line insertion, in a population of severe adult burns patients (burns involving ≥20% total body surface area (TBSA)) admitted to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Intensive Care Unit over five years (2015-2019 inclusive). On multivariate analysis, central line duration and burn TBSA were identified as independent risk factors for CLABSI, with central line duration the most significant predictor (p = 0.0008; OR 1.177, 95% CI 1.072-1.299). No risk factor independently predicted CRBSI. CLABSI detection occurred a median of 8.5 days (IQR 6.0-11.0) post central line insertion. These findings suggest further research to assess the efficacy of routine line changes prior to the at-risk period of 6-11 days post central line insertion in reducing CLABSI in severe adult burns patients may be beneficial.

大型烧伤三级转诊中心重症成人烧伤患者中心管路持续时间和其他风险因素对中心管路相关血流感染的影响:一项为期 5 年的回顾性研究。
中心管路相关血流感染(CLABSI)和导管相关血流感染(导管尖端培养阳性的 CLABSI,CRBSI)是严重成年烧伤患者发病和死亡的可预防原因。常规更换中心管路作为烧伤患者预防 CLABSI 的一种策略尚存在争议,因为缺乏证据来指导更换管路的适当时机。本研究旨在通过调查中心静脉置管脓毒症的相关风险因素(包括中心静脉置管的持续时间)来填补这一证据空白,研究对象为五年内(2015-2019年,含2015-2019年)入住布里斯班皇家妇女医院重症监护病房的严重成年烧伤患者(烧伤面积≥20%)。经多变量分析,中心管路持续时间和烧伤总体表面积被确定为CLABSI的独立风险因素,其中中心管路持续时间是最重要的预测因素(p = 0.0008;OR 1.177,95% CI 1.072-1.299)。没有任何风险因素能独立预测 CRBSI。CLABSI的发现时间中位数为插入中心管后8.5天(IQR 6.0-11.0)。这些研究结果表明,进一步研究评估在中心管路插入后 6-11 天的高危期之前更换常规管路对减少重症成人烧伤患者 CLABSI 的疗效可能会有所裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信