Target selection during “snapshot” foraging

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Sofia Tkhan Tin Le, Árni Kristjánsson, W. Joseph MacInnes
{"title":"Target selection during “snapshot” foraging","authors":"Sofia Tkhan Tin Le,&nbsp;Árni Kristjánsson,&nbsp;W. Joseph MacInnes","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02988-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While previous foraging studies have identified key variables that determine attentional selection, they are affected by the global statistics of the tasks. In most studies, targets are selected one at a time without replacement while distractor numbers remain constant, steadily reducing the ratios of targets to distractors with every selection. We designed a foraging task with a sequence of local “snapshots” of foraging displays, with each snapshot requiring a target selection. This enabled tighter control of local target and distractor type ratios while maintaining the flavor of a sequential, multiple-target foraging task. Observers saw only six items for each target selection during a “snapshot” containing varying numbers of two target types and two distractor types. After each selection, a new six-item array (the following snapshot) immediately appeared, centered on the locus of the last selected target. We contrasted feature-based and conjunction-based foraging and analyzed the data by the proportion of different target types in each trial. We found that target type proportion affected selection, with longer response times during conjunction foraging when the number of the alternate target types was greater than the repeated target types. In addition, the choice of target in each snapshot was influenced by the relative positions of selected targets and distractors during preceding snapshots. Importantly, this shows to what degree previous findings on foraging can be attributed to changing global statistics of the foraging array. We propose that “snapshot foraging” can increase experimental control in understanding how people choose targets during continuous attentional orienting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"86 8","pages":"2778 - 2793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02988-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While previous foraging studies have identified key variables that determine attentional selection, they are affected by the global statistics of the tasks. In most studies, targets are selected one at a time without replacement while distractor numbers remain constant, steadily reducing the ratios of targets to distractors with every selection. We designed a foraging task with a sequence of local “snapshots” of foraging displays, with each snapshot requiring a target selection. This enabled tighter control of local target and distractor type ratios while maintaining the flavor of a sequential, multiple-target foraging task. Observers saw only six items for each target selection during a “snapshot” containing varying numbers of two target types and two distractor types. After each selection, a new six-item array (the following snapshot) immediately appeared, centered on the locus of the last selected target. We contrasted feature-based and conjunction-based foraging and analyzed the data by the proportion of different target types in each trial. We found that target type proportion affected selection, with longer response times during conjunction foraging when the number of the alternate target types was greater than the repeated target types. In addition, the choice of target in each snapshot was influenced by the relative positions of selected targets and distractors during preceding snapshots. Importantly, this shows to what degree previous findings on foraging can be attributed to changing global statistics of the foraging array. We propose that “snapshot foraging” can increase experimental control in understanding how people choose targets during continuous attentional orienting.

Abstract Image

在 "快照 "觅食过程中选择目标。
虽然以往的觅食研究已经确定了决定注意力选择的关键变量,但这些变量会受到任务总体统计的影响。在大多数研究中,目标每次选择一个,不会替换,而分心物的数量保持不变,每次选择都会稳步降低目标与分心物的比例。我们设计的觅食任务包含一系列觅食显示的局部 "快照",每次快照都需要选择一个目标。这样既能更严格地控制局部目标和分心类型的比例,又能保持连续、多目标觅食任务的风味。观察者在 "快照 "中每次选择目标时只能看到六个项目,而 "快照 "中包含数量不等的两种目标类型和两种干扰类型。每次选择后,都会立即出现一个新的六项目阵列(下一个快照),该阵列以最后一次选择的目标位置为中心。我们对基于特征的觅食和基于结合的觅食进行了对比,并根据每次试验中不同目标类型的比例对数据进行了分析。我们发现,目标类型的比例会影响选择,当交替目标类型的数量多于重复目标类型时,联合觅食的反应时间更长。此外,在每次快照中对目标的选择还受到前面快照中被选目标和干扰物的相对位置的影响。重要的是,这表明了之前关于觅食的发现在多大程度上可以归因于觅食阵列的全局统计量的变化。我们提出,"快照觅食 "可以增加实验控制,以了解人们在连续注意定向过程中如何选择目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信