A Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Pharmacokinetic Similarity Studies and Comparative Clinical Studies

Ping Ji PhD, Sarah J. Schrieber Pharm D, Rachel Glaser MD, Jianmeng Chen MD, PhD, Chinmay Shukla PhD, Suresh Doddapaneni PhD, Sahajwalla Chandrahas PhD
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Pharmacokinetic Similarity Studies and Comparative Clinical Studies","authors":"Ping Ji PhD,&nbsp;Sarah J. Schrieber Pharm D,&nbsp;Rachel Glaser MD,&nbsp;Jianmeng Chen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Chinmay Shukla PhD,&nbsp;Suresh Doddapaneni PhD,&nbsp;Sahajwalla Chandrahas PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A biosimilar clinical development program generally includes a pharmacokinetic similarity study and a comparative clinical study. Since both types of studies assess safety and immunogenicity, it is important to evaluate the role of each in determining whether there are any meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar products and the reference products. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and immunogenicity data from pharmacokinetic similarity studies and comparative clinical studies, using a database of approved monoclonal antibody and fusion protein biosimilars. Our analysis showed that pharmacokinetic similarity studies provided valuable information for comparing the immunogenicity and safety of the monoclonal antibody and fusion protein biosimilars with their respective reference products. This work underscores the evolving understanding of these biologics and offers insights into the clinical development of biosimilars.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 4","pages":"499-507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.6165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A biosimilar clinical development program generally includes a pharmacokinetic similarity study and a comparative clinical study. Since both types of studies assess safety and immunogenicity, it is important to evaluate the role of each in determining whether there are any meaningful differences between the proposed biosimilar products and the reference products. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and immunogenicity data from pharmacokinetic similarity studies and comparative clinical studies, using a database of approved monoclonal antibody and fusion protein biosimilars. Our analysis showed that pharmacokinetic similarity studies provided valuable information for comparing the immunogenicity and safety of the monoclonal antibody and fusion protein biosimilars with their respective reference products. This work underscores the evolving understanding of these biologics and offers insights into the clinical development of biosimilars.

药代动力学相似性研究和比较临床研究的安全性和免疫原性的 Meta 分析。
生物类似药临床开发计划一般包括药代动力学相似性研究和比较临床研究。由于这两类研究都是对安全性和免疫原性进行评估,因此在确定拟开发的生物类似药产品与参比产品之间是否存在任何有意义的差异时,必须对每种研究的作用进行评估。我们利用已获批准的单克隆抗体和融合蛋白生物类似药数据库,对来自药代动力学相似性研究和比较临床研究的安全性和免疫原性数据进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们的分析表明,药代动力学相似性研究为比较单克隆抗体和融合蛋白生物仿制药与各自的参比产品的免疫原性和安全性提供了有价值的信息。这项工作强调了人们对这些生物制剂不断发展的认识,并为生物仿制药的临床开发提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信