The safety and efficacy of pRESET stent retriever for treatment of thrombo-embolic stroke; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Mohammad Amin Habibi, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Saba Sabet, Amir Hessam Zare, Mohammad Sina Mirjani, Amir Reza Boskabadi, Zahra Aslani Kolur, Maryam Bozorgi
{"title":"The safety and efficacy of pRESET stent retriever for treatment of thrombo-embolic stroke; a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Saba Sabet, Amir Hessam Zare, Mohammad Sina Mirjani, Amir Reza Boskabadi, Zahra Aslani Kolur, Maryam Bozorgi","doi":"10.1177/19714009241303083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pRESET stent retriever is a self-expanding nitinol stent designed for mechanical thrombectomy in cases of large vessel occlusion during acute ischemic stroke. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of the pRESET device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, WoS, and Scopus were systematically reviewed from inception to 8 July 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies involving 1163 patients were included. The pooled mortality rate was 18% with a 95% CI of [12%, 25%]. The rates of any hemorrhagic complication, parenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage were 22% with a 95% CI of [12%, 36%], 7% with a 95% CI of [4%, 13%], and 10% with a 95% CI of [5%, 17%], respectively. The rate of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at 90 days was 43% with a 95% CI of [34%, 52%]. Successful recanalization rates were 60% with a 95% CI of [52%, 67%] after the first pass and 90% with a 95% CI of [83%, 95%] after the final pass. Rescue devices were used in 13% with a 95% CI of [7%, 24%] of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pRESET stent retriever demonstrates high recanalization rates and reasonable safety outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Further randomized trials directly comparing pRESET to other stent retrievers are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241303083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pRESET stent retriever is a self-expanding nitinol stent designed for mechanical thrombectomy in cases of large vessel occlusion during acute ischemic stroke. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of the pRESET device.

Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, WoS, and Scopus were systematically reviewed from inception to 8 July 2024.

Results: A total of eight studies involving 1163 patients were included. The pooled mortality rate was 18% with a 95% CI of [12%, 25%]. The rates of any hemorrhagic complication, parenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage were 22% with a 95% CI of [12%, 36%], 7% with a 95% CI of [4%, 13%], and 10% with a 95% CI of [5%, 17%], respectively. The rate of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at 90 days was 43% with a 95% CI of [34%, 52%]. Successful recanalization rates were 60% with a 95% CI of [52%, 67%] after the first pass and 90% with a 95% CI of [83%, 95%] after the final pass. Rescue devices were used in 13% with a 95% CI of [7%, 24%] of cases.

Conclusions: The pRESET stent retriever demonstrates high recanalization rates and reasonable safety outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Further randomized trials directly comparing pRESET to other stent retrievers are warranted.

用于治疗血栓栓塞性中风的 pRESET 支架回流器的安全性和有效性;系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:pRESET 支架取栓器是一种自膨胀镍钛诺支架,设计用于急性缺血性卒中大血管闭塞时的机械性血栓清除。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了有关 pRESET 装置安全性和有效性的现有证据:这是一项基于系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)的系统综述和荟萃分析研究。研究人员对 PubMed、Embase、WoS 和 Scopus 等电子数据库中从开始到 2024 年 7 月 8 日的内容进行了系统回顾:结果:共纳入 8 项研究,涉及 1163 名患者。汇总死亡率为 18%,95% CI 为 [12%, 25%]。任何出血并发症、实质出血和蛛网膜下腔出血的发生率分别为 22%(95% CI 为 [12%,36%])、7%(95% CI 为 [4%,13%])和 10%(95% CI 为 [5%,17%])。90天后的良好功能预后率(改良Rankin量表0-2)为43%,95% CI为[34%,52%]。首次再通的成功率为 60%,95% CI 为 [52%, 67%];最后一次再通的成功率为 90%,95% CI 为 [83%, 95%]。13%的病例使用了救援装置,95% CI为[7%,24%]:结论:对于因大血管闭塞而接受机械血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性卒中的患者,pRESET 支架回取器显示出较高的再通率和合理的安全性。有必要进一步开展随机试验,将 pRESET 与其他支架取栓器进行直接比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信