Manual physical therapy for neck disorders: an umbrella review.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Breanna Reynolds, Amy McDevitt, Joseph Kelly, Paul Mintken, Derek Clewley
{"title":"Manual physical therapy for neck disorders: an umbrella review.","authors":"Breanna Reynolds, Amy McDevitt, Joseph Kelly, Paul Mintken, Derek Clewley","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2425788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder, with a prevalence rate (age-standardized) of 27.0 per 1000 in 2019. Approximately 50-85% of individuals with acute neck pain do not experience complete resolution of symptoms, experiencing chronic pain. Manual therapy is a widely employed treatment approach for nonspecific neck pain (NSNP), cervical radiculopathy (CR) and cervicogenic headaches (CGH). This umbrella review synthesized systematic reviews examining manual physical therapy for individuals with cervical disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed with Prospero registration (CRD42022327434). Four databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2023 for systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis examining manual therapy for individuals with neck pain of any stage. Interventions included any manual physical therapy of the cervical or thoracic spine as well as neuromobilization of the upper quarter. Primary outcomes included pain and disability. Two reviewers screened for eligibility and completed data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 SRs were included: 15 NSNP, 7 cervical radiculopathy, 9 CGH and 4 samples with combined diagnoses. AMSTAR 2 ratings of the SRs support high confidence in results for 10 reviews, moderate confidence in 12 reviews and low to critically low confidence in 13 reviews. For NSNP, there was high confidence in the results showing manual therapy combined with exercise was superior to either treatment in isolation. In cervical radiculopathy, neural mobilization, distraction, soft tissue treatment and mobilization/manipulation to cervical and thoracic spine were supported with moderate confidence in results. For CGH, there was high confidence in the results supporting the use of cervical spine mobilization/manipulation, soft tissue mobilization, and manual therapy combined with exercise. Original authors of SRs reported varying quality of primary studies with lack of consistent high quality/low risk of bias designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Manual therapy plus exercise, cervical or thoracic mobilization and manipulation, neuromobilization, and other types of manual therapy were supported as effective interventions in the management of pain and disability for individuals with NSNP, CGH, or CR in the short-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2425788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder, with a prevalence rate (age-standardized) of 27.0 per 1000 in 2019. Approximately 50-85% of individuals with acute neck pain do not experience complete resolution of symptoms, experiencing chronic pain. Manual therapy is a widely employed treatment approach for nonspecific neck pain (NSNP), cervical radiculopathy (CR) and cervicogenic headaches (CGH). This umbrella review synthesized systematic reviews examining manual physical therapy for individuals with cervical disorders.

Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed with Prospero registration (CRD42022327434). Four databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2023 for systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis examining manual therapy for individuals with neck pain of any stage. Interventions included any manual physical therapy of the cervical or thoracic spine as well as neuromobilization of the upper quarter. Primary outcomes included pain and disability. Two reviewers screened for eligibility and completed data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) tool.

Results: A total of 35 SRs were included: 15 NSNP, 7 cervical radiculopathy, 9 CGH and 4 samples with combined diagnoses. AMSTAR 2 ratings of the SRs support high confidence in results for 10 reviews, moderate confidence in 12 reviews and low to critically low confidence in 13 reviews. For NSNP, there was high confidence in the results showing manual therapy combined with exercise was superior to either treatment in isolation. In cervical radiculopathy, neural mobilization, distraction, soft tissue treatment and mobilization/manipulation to cervical and thoracic spine were supported with moderate confidence in results. For CGH, there was high confidence in the results supporting the use of cervical spine mobilization/manipulation, soft tissue mobilization, and manual therapy combined with exercise. Original authors of SRs reported varying quality of primary studies with lack of consistent high quality/low risk of bias designs.

Conclusion: Manual therapy plus exercise, cervical or thoracic mobilization and manipulation, neuromobilization, and other types of manual therapy were supported as effective interventions in the management of pain and disability for individuals with NSNP, CGH, or CR in the short-term.

颈部疾病的手法理疗:综述。
导言:颈部疼痛是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病:颈痛是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,2019 年的发病率(年龄标准化)为 27.0‰。约有 50%-85% 的急性颈部疼痛患者症状不会完全缓解,而是会经历慢性疼痛。手法治疗是治疗非特异性颈痛(NSNP)、颈椎病(CR)和颈源性头痛(CGH)的一种广泛采用的治疗方法。本综述综合了对颈椎病患者进行手法物理治疗的系统综述:方法:遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并在 Prospero 注册(CRD42022327434)。从 2016 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月,在四个数据库中检索了对任何阶段的颈部疼痛患者进行人工疗法研究的系统性综述,无论是否进行了荟萃分析。干预措施包括颈椎或胸椎的任何手动物理治疗以及上半身的神经固定。主要结果包括疼痛和残疾。两名审稿人筛选了符合条件的患者并完成了数据提取。方法学质量采用多重系统综述评估(AMSTAR 2)工具进行评估:结果:共纳入 35 篇系统综述:结果:共纳入了 35 篇综述:15 篇 NSNP、7 篇颈椎病、9 篇 CGH 和 4 篇综合诊断样本。AMSTAR 2对SR的评级支持对10篇综述结果的高度置信,对12篇综述结果的中度置信,以及对13篇综述结果的低度至极度低度置信。就 NSNP 而言,对结果的置信度较高,显示手法治疗结合锻炼优于单独使用其中一种治疗方法。在颈椎病方面,神经活动、牵引、软组织治疗以及颈椎和胸椎活动/手法治疗的结果得到了中度置信度的支持。对于 CGH,支持使用颈椎活动/手法治疗、软组织活动和结合运动的手法治疗的结果可信度较高。研究报告的原作者报告的主要研究质量参差不齐,缺乏一致的高质量/低偏倚风险设计:结论:人工疗法加运动、颈椎或胸椎活动和手法、神经活动和其他类型的人工疗法被认为是短期内治疗 NSNP、CGH 或 CR 患者疼痛和残疾的有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信