Perspectives on Public Health Department Accreditation: Lessons Learned From Ohio's Accreditation Mandate.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tonni Oberly, Simone R Singh, Amy Bush Stevens, Robin Blair-Ackison, Anna Sheeran, Britt Lang
{"title":"Perspectives on Public Health Department Accreditation: Lessons Learned From Ohio's Accreditation Mandate.","authors":"Tonni Oberly, Simone R Singh, Amy Bush Stevens, Robin Blair-Ackison, Anna Sheeran, Britt Lang","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ohio is the only state that requires local health departments (LHDs) to be accredited by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB). As of May 2024, 80% of Ohio's 111 LHDs achieved accreditation, making Ohio the state with the highest proportion of accredited LHDs in the country.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the experience of public health accreditation in Ohio including the perceived value of PHAB accreditation for LHDs. It also explored the extent to which perspectives on the value of mandatory accreditation differed between state and local health officials.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data for this study was obtained from 5 focus group interviews with 41 participants, representing state and local perspectives on PHAB accreditation in Ohio. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using inductive and deductive coding for a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus group participants outlined numerous advantages that accreditation has brought to their organizations. Commonly cited benefits include enhancements in quality improvement and performance management, strengthened collaborations and partnerships, improved communications, and optimized resource use. Challenges in achieving accreditation involved the financial expenses associated with the process and constraints on staffing resources. State officials generally expressed positive views on the accreditation mandate, perceiving it as a pathway to modernize the public health system and ensure consistency in service delivery across communities. In contrast, local stakeholders offered more nuanced perspectives and voiced concerns about the intentions behind the mandate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experience of health officials in Ohio offers lessons for both PHAB and officials in other states working to increase public health department accreditation levels. Successful implementation of accreditation mandates requires trust between state and local partners, open communication, and clarity of purpose. Moreover, attaining accreditation necessitates substantial resources, including technical assistance, financial support, and a robust workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Ohio is the only state that requires local health departments (LHDs) to be accredited by the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB). As of May 2024, 80% of Ohio's 111 LHDs achieved accreditation, making Ohio the state with the highest proportion of accredited LHDs in the country.

Objectives: This study examined the experience of public health accreditation in Ohio including the perceived value of PHAB accreditation for LHDs. It also explored the extent to which perspectives on the value of mandatory accreditation differed between state and local health officials.

Design: Data for this study was obtained from 5 focus group interviews with 41 participants, representing state and local perspectives on PHAB accreditation in Ohio. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using inductive and deductive coding for a thematic analysis.

Results: Focus group participants outlined numerous advantages that accreditation has brought to their organizations. Commonly cited benefits include enhancements in quality improvement and performance management, strengthened collaborations and partnerships, improved communications, and optimized resource use. Challenges in achieving accreditation involved the financial expenses associated with the process and constraints on staffing resources. State officials generally expressed positive views on the accreditation mandate, perceiving it as a pathway to modernize the public health system and ensure consistency in service delivery across communities. In contrast, local stakeholders offered more nuanced perspectives and voiced concerns about the intentions behind the mandate.

Conclusions: The experience of health officials in Ohio offers lessons for both PHAB and officials in other states working to increase public health department accreditation levels. Successful implementation of accreditation mandates requires trust between state and local partners, open communication, and clarity of purpose. Moreover, attaining accreditation necessitates substantial resources, including technical assistance, financial support, and a robust workforce.

关于公共卫生部门评审的观点:从俄亥俄州评审任务中汲取的经验教训。
背景:俄亥俄州是唯一一个要求地方卫生部门 (LHD) 通过公共卫生认证委员会 (PHAB) 认证的州。截至 2024 年 5 月,俄亥俄州 111 个地方卫生局中有 80% 通过了评审,使俄亥俄州成为全国通过评审的地方卫生局比例最高的州:本研究考察了俄亥俄州公共卫生评审的经验,包括公共卫生评审委员会评审对地方卫生局的认知价值。研究还探讨了州和地方卫生官员对强制性评审价值的不同看法:本研究的数据来自 5 次焦点小组访谈,共有 41 人参加,代表了俄亥俄州和地方对 PHAB 评审的看法。对访谈进行记录、转录,并使用归纳和演绎编码法进行主题分析:焦点小组参与者概述了评审为其组织带来的众多好处。他们普遍提到的好处包括:提高质量和绩效管理、加强合作和伙伴关系、改善沟通以及优化资源利用。通过评审所面临的挑战包括与评审过程相关的财务支出和人力资源限制。州政府官员普遍对评审任务表示肯定,认为这是实现公共卫生系统现代化和确保各社区服务一致性的途径。与此相反,地方利益相关者则提出了更多细致入微的观点,并对该任务背后的意图表示担忧:俄亥俄州卫生官员的经验为 PHAB 和其他州致力于提高公共卫生部门评审水平的官员提供了借鉴。成功实施评审任务需要州与地方合作伙伴之间的信任、坦诚的沟通和明确的目的。此外,获得评审还需要大量资源,包括技术援助、财政支持和强大的劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信