Application Value of Ureteral Stents in Adjunctive Treatment for Renal Tuberculosis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yeqiang Wang, Sida Hao, Pengju Liu, Guofeng Cai, Yong Qin
{"title":"Application Value of Ureteral Stents in Adjunctive Treatment for Renal Tuberculosis.","authors":"Yeqiang Wang, Sida Hao, Pengju Liu, Guofeng Cai, Yong Qin","doi":"10.1159/000542780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess and enhance the application value of ureteral stents in the adjunctive treatment of renal tuberculosis, thus providing a robust evidence-based framework for guiding clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 360 patients diagnosed with renal tuberculosis between January 2019 and December 2023 were meticulously selected for this study. Utilizing a random number table, the patients were stratified into a control group and a study group, with 180 patients in each cohort. The control group received standard antituberculosis treatment, while the study group underwent adjunctive treatment with ureteral stents. A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the differential clinical efficacy, renal excision rate, renal function, degree of renal pelvis separation, and renal parenchymal thickness between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group showed significantly better clinical cure rates and effectiveness compared to the control group. While the 12-month renal excision rate was similar between groups, the 18-month rate was significantly lower in the study group. The study group also had lower posttreatment BUN and serum creatinine levels, reduced renal pelvis separation, and greater renal parenchymal thickness. At 3 and 9 months, complications were significantly fewer in the study group (p < 0.001, p < 0.05), with no severe complications reported. Additionally, the study group had higher overall SF-36 scores (p < 0.001), indicating better quality of life. The treatment success rate (87.2% vs. 70.6%, p < 0.001), renal function preservation (76.7% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.001), and lower recurrence rate (16.1% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.028) further highlighted the benefits of ureteral stenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adjunctive use of ureteral stents in the treatment of renal tuberculosis presents a significantly enhanced application value. It not only improves clinical efficacy but also diminishes the need for renal excision, effectively preserves renal function, reduces the degree of renal pelvis separation, and maintains optimal renal parenchymal thickness. Thus, advocating for the widespread implementation of ureteral stents as an adjunctive therapeutic modality for managing renal tuberculosis is strongly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to assess and enhance the application value of ureteral stents in the adjunctive treatment of renal tuberculosis, thus providing a robust evidence-based framework for guiding clinical management strategies.

Methods: A total of 360 patients diagnosed with renal tuberculosis between January 2019 and December 2023 were meticulously selected for this study. Utilizing a random number table, the patients were stratified into a control group and a study group, with 180 patients in each cohort. The control group received standard antituberculosis treatment, while the study group underwent adjunctive treatment with ureteral stents. A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the differential clinical efficacy, renal excision rate, renal function, degree of renal pelvis separation, and renal parenchymal thickness between the two groups.

Results: The study group showed significantly better clinical cure rates and effectiveness compared to the control group. While the 12-month renal excision rate was similar between groups, the 18-month rate was significantly lower in the study group. The study group also had lower posttreatment BUN and serum creatinine levels, reduced renal pelvis separation, and greater renal parenchymal thickness. At 3 and 9 months, complications were significantly fewer in the study group (p < 0.001, p < 0.05), with no severe complications reported. Additionally, the study group had higher overall SF-36 scores (p < 0.001), indicating better quality of life. The treatment success rate (87.2% vs. 70.6%, p < 0.001), renal function preservation (76.7% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.001), and lower recurrence rate (16.1% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.028) further highlighted the benefits of ureteral stenting.

Conclusion: The adjunctive use of ureteral stents in the treatment of renal tuberculosis presents a significantly enhanced application value. It not only improves clinical efficacy but also diminishes the need for renal excision, effectively preserves renal function, reduces the degree of renal pelvis separation, and maintains optimal renal parenchymal thickness. Thus, advocating for the widespread implementation of ureteral stents as an adjunctive therapeutic modality for managing renal tuberculosis is strongly recommended.

输尿管支架在肾结核辅助治疗中的应用价值。
研究目的本研究旨在评估和提高输尿管支架在肾结核辅助治疗中的应用价值,从而为指导临床管理策略提供一个强有力的循证框架:本研究精心选取了2019年1月至2023年12月期间确诊的360例肾结核患者。利用随机数字表将患者分为对照组和研究组,每组 180 人。对照组接受标准抗结核治疗,研究组则接受输尿管支架辅助治疗。对两组患者的临床疗效、肾切除率、肾功能、肾盂分离程度和肾实质厚度进行了对比分析:研究组的临床治愈率和临床疗效明显优于对照组。两组 12 个月的肾切除率无明显统计学差异,而研究组 18 个月的肾切除率明显低于对照组。此外,研究组治疗后的血尿素氮(BUN)和血清肌酐(Scr)水平大幅降低,明显低于对照组。此外,与对照组相比,研究组的肾盂分离程度明显降低,肾实质厚度明显增加:结论:在肾结核治疗中辅助使用输尿管支架的应用价值显著提高。结论:输尿管支架辅助治疗肾结核的应用价值明显提升,不仅提高了临床疗效,还减少了肾切除的必要性,有效保留了肾功能,降低了肾盂分离程度,维持了最佳的肾实质厚度。因此,强烈建议将输尿管支架作为治疗肾结核的一种辅助治疗方式来广泛推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信