Polygenic scores and social determinants of health: their correlations and potential biases.

IF 3.3 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Daniel J Schaid, Shannon K McDonnell, Farida S Akhtari, Jason P Sinnwell, Anthony Batzler, Ewan K Cobran, Alison Motsinger-Reif
{"title":"Polygenic scores and social determinants of health: their correlations and potential biases.","authors":"Daniel J Schaid, Shannon K McDonnell, Farida S Akhtari, Jason P Sinnwell, Anthony Batzler, Ewan K Cobran, Alison Motsinger-Reif","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of polygenic scores (PGS) for personalized medicine has gained momentum, along with caution to avoid accentuating health disparities. Greater ancestral diversity in genetic studies is needed, as well as close attention to social determinants of health (SDoH ).We measured the correlations between 3,030 PGS from the PGS Catalog and SDoH among participants in the Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS). Correlations mainly ranged from -0.05 to 0.05, yet there was heterogeneity of correlations across SDoH themes, with the largest amount of heterogeneity for PGS predicting body measures and smoking, as well as some common diseases. We also quantify the expected bias of PGS effect size on disease risk when strong predictors, such as SDoH, are omitted from models, emphasizing the importance of including SDoH with PGS to avoid biased estimates of PGS risk and to achieve equitable precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":" ","pages":"100389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of polygenic scores (PGS) for personalized medicine has gained momentum, along with caution to avoid accentuating health disparities. Greater ancestral diversity in genetic studies is needed, as well as close attention to social determinants of health (SDoH ).We measured the correlations between 3,030 PGS from the PGS Catalog and SDoH among participants in the Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS). Correlations mainly ranged from -0.05 to 0.05, yet there was heterogeneity of correlations across SDoH themes, with the largest amount of heterogeneity for PGS predicting body measures and smoking, as well as some common diseases. We also quantify the expected bias of PGS effect size on disease risk when strong predictors, such as SDoH, are omitted from models, emphasizing the importance of including SDoH with PGS to avoid biased estimates of PGS risk and to achieve equitable precision medicine.

多基因评分和健康的社会决定因素:其相关性和潜在偏差。
将多基因评分(PGS)用于个性化医疗的势头越来越猛,但同时也要注意避免加剧健康差异。我们测量了个性化环境与基因研究(PEGS)参与者中来自 PGS 目录的 3,030 个 PGS 与 SDoH 之间的相关性。相关性主要介于-0.05至0.05之间,但不同SDoH主题之间的相关性存在异质性,其中预测身体测量和吸烟以及一些常见疾病的PGS异质性最大。我们还量化了当模型中省略 SDoH 等强预测因子时,PGS 对疾病风险影响大小的预期偏差,强调了将 SDoH 纳入 PGS 的重要性,以避免对 PGS 风险估计的偏差,实现公平的精准医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HGG Advances
HGG Advances Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信