[Study on the effect of the distribution of bone cement of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebra plasty].

Q4 Medicine
Dong-Fang Yu, Xiang-Shan Wang, De-Peng Kou, Shun-Hai Cao
{"title":"[Study on the effect of the distribution of bone cement of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebra plasty].","authors":"Dong-Fang Yu, Xiang-Shan Wang, De-Peng Kou, Shun-Hai Cao","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of bone cement distribution on efficacy of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebra plasty(PVP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2017 to December 2020, a total of 65 cases with single segment osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures underwent parallel vertebroplasty surgery. On the basis of the postoperative X-ray films of bone cement distribution were divided into two groups. The bone cement was biased to the lateral side of the vertebral body (partial group, 20 cases), there were 9 males and 11 famales with an average age of (70.3±7.4) years old ranging from 60 to 84 years old. The bone cement was over the vertebral midline, and completely filled with contralateral vertebral body (bilateral group, 45 cases), there were 10 males and 35 famales with an average age of (70.7±8.0) years old ranging from 60 to 86 years old. All of them underwent PVP surgery, bone cement was injected into the vertebral body through paitail transpedicular approach. The amount of bone cement injection, the visual analogue scale(VAS) of preoperation and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months after surgery between two groups were observed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of cement injection was (4.25±0.99) ml in the partial group, and (4.07±1.18) ml in the bilateral group, there was no significant difference between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Postoperative pain was relieved than preoperative pain (<i>P</i><0.05), the VAS of 1 day, 1 and 3 months after operation (3.90±1.37), (2.35±0.67) and (1.55±0.51) in the partial group were higher than (2.67±0.60), (1.62±0.58) and (1.31±0.47) in the bilateral group (<i>P</i><0.05). There were 9 cases in partial group, the pain was not relieved due to unfilled cement until the contralateral bone was injected into the bone cement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distribution of bone cement is one of the main factors affecting residual back pain after PVP, and in the clinical, we should make sure the distribution of bone cement over the midline of vertebral body.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"37 11","pages":"1075-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of bone cement distribution on efficacy of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebra plasty(PVP).

Methods: From January 2017 to December 2020, a total of 65 cases with single segment osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures underwent parallel vertebroplasty surgery. On the basis of the postoperative X-ray films of bone cement distribution were divided into two groups. The bone cement was biased to the lateral side of the vertebral body (partial group, 20 cases), there were 9 males and 11 famales with an average age of (70.3±7.4) years old ranging from 60 to 84 years old. The bone cement was over the vertebral midline, and completely filled with contralateral vertebral body (bilateral group, 45 cases), there were 10 males and 35 famales with an average age of (70.7±8.0) years old ranging from 60 to 86 years old. All of them underwent PVP surgery, bone cement was injected into the vertebral body through paitail transpedicular approach. The amount of bone cement injection, the visual analogue scale(VAS) of preoperation and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months after surgery between two groups were observed and compared.

Results: The amount of cement injection was (4.25±0.99) ml in the partial group, and (4.07±1.18) ml in the bilateral group, there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative pain was relieved than preoperative pain (P<0.05), the VAS of 1 day, 1 and 3 months after operation (3.90±1.37), (2.35±0.67) and (1.55±0.51) in the partial group were higher than (2.67±0.60), (1.62±0.58) and (1.31±0.47) in the bilateral group (P<0.05). There were 9 cases in partial group, the pain was not relieved due to unfilled cement until the contralateral bone was injected into the bone cement.

Conclusion: The distribution of bone cement is one of the main factors affecting residual back pain after PVP, and in the clinical, we should make sure the distribution of bone cement over the midline of vertebral body.

[经皮椎体成形术后残余背痛的骨水泥分布影响研究]。
目的研究骨水泥分布对经皮椎体成形术(PVP)后残余腰痛疗效的影响:2017年1月至2020年12月,共65例单节段骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折患者接受平行椎体成形术。根据术后X光片骨水泥分布情况分为两组。骨水泥偏向椎体外侧组(部分组,20 例),其中男性 9 例,女性 11 例,平均年龄(70.3±7.4)岁,从 60 岁到 84 岁不等。骨水泥覆盖椎体中线,并完全填充对侧椎体(双侧组,45 例),男性 10 例,女性 35 例,平均年龄(70.7±8.0)岁,从 60 岁到 86 岁不等。所有患者均接受了椎体后凸成形术(PVP),通过椎弓根经椎管入路将骨水泥注入椎体。观察并比较两组患者的骨水泥注射量、术前、术后 1 天、1 个月、3 个月的视觉模拟量表(VAS):结果:部分组骨水泥注射量为(4.25±0.99)ml,双侧组为(4.07±1.18)ml,两组差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后疼痛较术前减轻(PPC结论:骨水泥的分布是影响 PVP 术后残余背痛的主要因素之一,临床中应确保骨水泥分布在椎体中线上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信