What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.240882
Aditya Gulati, Marina Martínez-Garcia, Daniel Fernández, Miguel Angel Lozano, Bruno Lepri, Nuria Oliver
{"title":"What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters.","authors":"Aditya Gulati, Marina Martínez-Garcia, Daniel Fernández, Miguel Angel Lozano, Bruno Lepri, Nuria Oliver","doi":"10.1098/rsos.240882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of cognitive biases on decision-making in the digital world remains under-explored despite its well-documented effects in physical contexts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the attractiveness halo effect using AI-based beauty filters. We conduct a large-scale online user study involving 2748 participants who rated facial images from a diverse set of 462 distinct individuals in two conditions: original and attractive after applying a beauty filter. Our study reveals that the <i>same</i> individuals receive statistically significantly higher ratings of attractiveness and other traits, such as intelligence and trustworthiness, in the attractive condition. We also study the impact of age, gender and ethnicity and identify a weakening of the halo effect in the beautified condition, resolving conflicting findings from the literature and suggesting that filters could mitigate this cognitive bias. Finally, our findings raise ethical concerns regarding the use of beauty filters.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"11 11","pages":"240882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11597472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of cognitive biases on decision-making in the digital world remains under-explored despite its well-documented effects in physical contexts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the attractiveness halo effect using AI-based beauty filters. We conduct a large-scale online user study involving 2748 participants who rated facial images from a diverse set of 462 distinct individuals in two conditions: original and attractive after applying a beauty filter. Our study reveals that the same individuals receive statistically significantly higher ratings of attractiveness and other traits, such as intelligence and trustworthiness, in the attractive condition. We also study the impact of age, gender and ethnicity and identify a weakening of the halo effect in the beautified condition, resolving conflicting findings from the literature and suggesting that filters could mitigate this cognitive bias. Finally, our findings raise ethical concerns regarding the use of beauty filters.

美之为美,善莫大焉:美颜滤镜时代的吸引力光环效应。
尽管认知偏差对数字世界决策的影响在物理环境中已得到充分证明,但对其影响的研究仍然不足。本文利用基于人工智能的美颜滤镜研究了吸引力光环效应,从而弥补了这一空白。我们进行了一项大规模的在线用户研究,共有 2748 名参与者参与,他们在两种条件下对来自 462 个不同个体的面部图像进行评分:原始图像和应用美颜滤镜后的吸引力图像。我们的研究显示,在有吸引力的条件下,同样的人在吸引力和其他特征(如智力和可信度)方面获得的评分在统计学上明显更高。我们还研究了年龄、性别和种族的影响,发现美化条件下的光环效应有所减弱,解决了文献中相互矛盾的研究结果,并表明滤镜可以减轻这种认知偏差。最后,我们的研究结果提出了使用美颜滤镜的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信