Deceased Donor Infectious Diseases Testing and Antimicrobial Use: Surveys of Organ Procurement Organizations and Transplant Professionals.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Stephanie M Pouch, Judith A Anesi, Timothy Pruett, Michael Harmon, Sara O Dionne, Richard Hasz, Ricardo M La Hoz, Cameron Wolfe, Michael G Ison
{"title":"Deceased Donor Infectious Diseases Testing and Antimicrobial Use: Surveys of Organ Procurement Organizations and Transplant Professionals.","authors":"Stephanie M Pouch, Judith A Anesi, Timothy Pruett, Michael Harmon, Sara O Dionne, Richard Hasz, Ricardo M La Hoz, Cameron Wolfe, Michael G Ison","doi":"10.1111/tid.14407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Donor screening and antimicrobial management processes are inconsistent across organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and transplant centers. As part of a Controversies Conference addressing the evaluation and management of infectious diseases (ID) in deceased donors sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST), two online pre-meeting surveys were developed to inform conference proceedings and assess current practices and opinions on donor screening and antimicrobial management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey 1 addressed the current state of deceased donor ID testing, culture data communication, antimicrobial utilization, and involvement of transplant ID during donor management and was distributed to all 56 United States OPOs. Survey 2 evaluated transplant professionals' opinions regarding donor antimicrobial use and was sent to the AST Infectious Disease, Kidney Pancreas, Liver and Intestinal, and Thoracic and Critical Care Community of Practice listservs. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five (63%) unique responses were received from OPOs for Survey 1. Findings included variability in the timing of donor culture collection, frequent sampling of indwelling catheters, wide variation in the location of culture processing, and availability of additional susceptibility testing. Eighty-eight unique responses were received from approximately 1552 (6%) transplant providers for Survey 2. Of the respondents, 37% would not recommend standard antibiotics prior to organ recovery in the absence of suspected or confirmed infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These surveys demonstrate variability in donor testing, donor antimicrobial utilization, and transplant provider opinions regarding the need for and selection of antimicrobial agents. Findings highlight opportunities for standardized approaches to donor testing and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Donor screening and antimicrobial management processes are inconsistent across organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and transplant centers. As part of a Controversies Conference addressing the evaluation and management of infectious diseases (ID) in deceased donors sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST), two online pre-meeting surveys were developed to inform conference proceedings and assess current practices and opinions on donor screening and antimicrobial management.

Methods: Survey 1 addressed the current state of deceased donor ID testing, culture data communication, antimicrobial utilization, and involvement of transplant ID during donor management and was distributed to all 56 United States OPOs. Survey 2 evaluated transplant professionals' opinions regarding donor antimicrobial use and was sent to the AST Infectious Disease, Kidney Pancreas, Liver and Intestinal, and Thoracic and Critical Care Community of Practice listservs. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Thirty-five (63%) unique responses were received from OPOs for Survey 1. Findings included variability in the timing of donor culture collection, frequent sampling of indwelling catheters, wide variation in the location of culture processing, and availability of additional susceptibility testing. Eighty-eight unique responses were received from approximately 1552 (6%) transplant providers for Survey 2. Of the respondents, 37% would not recommend standard antibiotics prior to organ recovery in the absence of suspected or confirmed infection.

Conclusions: These surveys demonstrate variability in donor testing, donor antimicrobial utilization, and transplant provider opinions regarding the need for and selection of antimicrobial agents. Findings highlight opportunities for standardized approaches to donor testing and management.

死亡捐献者传染病检测和抗菌药使用:器官获取组织和移植专业人员调查。
背景:器官获取组织 (OPO) 和移植中心的供体筛查和抗菌药物管理流程并不一致。作为美国器官移植学会(AST)主办的争议会议的一部分,会议讨论了已故捐献者感染性疾病(ID)的评估和管理问题,会议开发了两项在线会前调查,为会议记录提供信息,并评估捐献者筛查和抗菌药物管理的当前实践和意见:调查 1 涉及已故捐献者 ID 检测、培养数据交流、抗菌药物使用和移植 ID 参与捐献者管理的现状,并分发给美国所有 56 个 OPO。调查 2 评估了移植专业人员对捐赠者抗菌药物使用的意见,并发送至 AST 传染病、肾脏胰腺、肝脏和肠道以及胸腔和重症监护实践社区列表服务器。对结果进行了描述性统计:调查 1 收到了 35 份(63%)来自 OPO 的独特回复。调查结果包括供体培养物采集时间的差异性、留置导管采样的频繁性、培养物处理地点的巨大差异以及是否提供额外的药敏试验。调查 2 收到了来自约 1552 家(6%)移植医疗机构的 88 份独特回复。受访者中,37%的人不建议在没有疑似或确诊感染的情况下在器官恢复前使用标准抗生素:这些调查表明,在捐献者检测、捐献者抗菌药物使用以及移植提供者对抗菌药物需求和选择的看法方面存在差异。调查结果凸显了对捐献者进行标准化检测和管理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信