Description and performance of two diet quality scores based on the Nova classification.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058006470
Caroline Dos Santos Costa, Francine Silva Dos Santos, Kamila Tiemann Gabe, Eurídice Martinez Steele, Fernanda Helena Marrocos-Leite, Neha Khandpur, Fernanda Rauber, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Renata Bertazzi Levy
{"title":"Description and performance of two diet quality scores based on the Nova classification.","authors":"Caroline Dos Santos Costa, Francine Silva Dos Santos, Kamila Tiemann Gabe, Eurídice Martinez Steele, Fernanda Helena Marrocos-Leite, Neha Khandpur, Fernanda Rauber, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Renata Bertazzi Levy","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058006470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe two low-burden diet quality scores and evaluate their performance in reflecting the dietary share of the least and most processed foods defined within the Nova food system classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included data from the NutriNet-Brasil cohort. Participants answered the Nova24hScreener, a 3-minute self-administered questionnaire measuring the consumption of a set of foods on the day before. Food items included in this tool belong to two main groups of the Nova classification: unprocessed or minimally processed whole plant foods (WPF, 33 items) and ultra-processed foods (UPF, 23 items). Two scores were obtained by summing the number of items checked: the Nova-WPF and the Nova-UPF. We compared the scores, respectively, with the dietary intake (% of total energy) of all unprocessed or minimally processed whole plant foods and all ultra-processed foods obtained from a full self-administered web-based 24-hour recall performed on the same day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approximate quintiles of each score had a direct and linear relationship with the corresponding % of energy intake (p-value for linear trend < 0.001). We found a substantial agreement between the intervals of each score and the corresponding % of energy intake (Nova-WPF score: Prevalence-Adjusted and Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) 0.72, 95%CI 0.64-0.81; Nova-UPF score: PABAK 0.79, 95%CI 0.69-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These two scores performed well against the dietary share of unprocessed or minimally processed whole plant foods and ultra-processed foods in Brazil and can be used to evaluate and monitor diet quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"58 ","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058006470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe two low-burden diet quality scores and evaluate their performance in reflecting the dietary share of the least and most processed foods defined within the Nova food system classification.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included data from the NutriNet-Brasil cohort. Participants answered the Nova24hScreener, a 3-minute self-administered questionnaire measuring the consumption of a set of foods on the day before. Food items included in this tool belong to two main groups of the Nova classification: unprocessed or minimally processed whole plant foods (WPF, 33 items) and ultra-processed foods (UPF, 23 items). Two scores were obtained by summing the number of items checked: the Nova-WPF and the Nova-UPF. We compared the scores, respectively, with the dietary intake (% of total energy) of all unprocessed or minimally processed whole plant foods and all ultra-processed foods obtained from a full self-administered web-based 24-hour recall performed on the same day.

Results: The approximate quintiles of each score had a direct and linear relationship with the corresponding % of energy intake (p-value for linear trend < 0.001). We found a substantial agreement between the intervals of each score and the corresponding % of energy intake (Nova-WPF score: Prevalence-Adjusted and Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) 0.72, 95%CI 0.64-0.81; Nova-UPF score: PABAK 0.79, 95%CI 0.69-0.88).

Conclusions: These two scores performed well against the dietary share of unprocessed or minimally processed whole plant foods and ultra-processed foods in Brazil and can be used to evaluate and monitor diet quality.

基于诺瓦分类法的两种膳食质量评分的描述和性能。
目的描述两种低负担膳食质量评分,并评估它们在反映诺瓦食品系统分类中定义的最少和最多加工食品的膳食比例方面的性能:这项横断面研究包括来自 NutriNet-Brasil 队列的数据。参与者回答了 "Nova24hScreener "问卷,这是一份3分钟的自填式问卷,用于测量前一天一组食物的消费情况。该工具中包含的食物项目属于Nova分类中的两大类:未加工或微量加工的全植物食品(WPF,33项)和超加工食品(UPF,23项)。将检查的项目数相加得出两个分数:Nova-WPF 和 Nova-UPF。我们将这些分数分别与当天在网上进行的24小时全面自填回忆中获得的所有未加工或微量加工的全植物食品和所有超加工食品的膳食摄入量(占总能量的百分比)进行了比较:每个分值的大约五分位数与相应的能量摄入百分比有直接的线性关系(线性趋势的 p 值 < 0.001)。我们发现,各分值的区间与相应的能量摄入百分比之间有很大的一致性(Nova-WPF 分值:0.5±1.0):流行率调整和偏差调整卡帕(PABAK)0.72,95%CI 0.64-0.81;Nova-UPF 评分:结论:这两项评分在巴西未加工或微量加工全植物食品和超加工食品的膳食比例方面表现良好,可用于评估和监测膳食质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信