Characterizing Hand Function in Parkinson's Disease Patients with a Self-Administered Electronic Manual Dexterity Test.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
A Elizabeth Jansen, Anson B Rosenfeldt, Cielita Lopez-Lennon, Hubert Fernandez, Eric Zimmerman, Peter B Imrey, Leland E Dibble, Jay L Alberts
{"title":"Characterizing Hand Function in Parkinson's Disease Patients with a Self-Administered Electronic Manual Dexterity Test.","authors":"A Elizabeth Jansen, Anson B Rosenfeldt, Cielita Lopez-Lennon, Hubert Fernandez, Eric Zimmerman, Peter B Imrey, Leland E Dibble, Jay L Alberts","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dexterous dysfunction is a bothersome patient-reported symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Current clinical assessments do not directly evaluate goal-directed hand function. This project sought to determine the capability of the electronic Manual Dexterity Test (MDT) to characterize dexterity across a range of PD patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To objectively quantify manual dexterity in individuals with PD using a self-administered manual dexterity test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and forty-nine PD patients completed trials of the MDT with each upper extremity (UE) both while ON and OFF antiparkinsonian medication. Differences in MDT by medication state, more vs less affected UE, and Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage were evaluated using linear mixed models. The relationships of trial duration to MDS-UPDRS II patient quality of life (QoL) questions for eating, dressing and hygiene were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MDT duration was significantly shorter ON medication (26.3 seconds) compared to OFF medication (27.2 seconds) (P < 0.001). Similarly, MDT duration was significantly shorter for less (25.8 seconds) compared to more (27.6 seconds) affected limb (P < 0.001). Trial durations increased with H&Y stage (P < 0.001 for trend). MDT performance was related to MDS-UPDRS II questions for eating, dressing, and hygiene performance (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MDT provides an objective and quantitative assessment of dexterity. The time to complete the MDT was sensitive to changes in medication state, more and less affected UE, disease severity, and important activities of daily living. The MDT has potential for utilization in precise tracking of manual dexterity over the course of PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dexterous dysfunction is a bothersome patient-reported symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Current clinical assessments do not directly evaluate goal-directed hand function. This project sought to determine the capability of the electronic Manual Dexterity Test (MDT) to characterize dexterity across a range of PD patients.

Objectives: To objectively quantify manual dexterity in individuals with PD using a self-administered manual dexterity test.

Methods: Two hundred and forty-nine PD patients completed trials of the MDT with each upper extremity (UE) both while ON and OFF antiparkinsonian medication. Differences in MDT by medication state, more vs less affected UE, and Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage were evaluated using linear mixed models. The relationships of trial duration to MDS-UPDRS II patient quality of life (QoL) questions for eating, dressing and hygiene were also evaluated.

Results: MDT duration was significantly shorter ON medication (26.3 seconds) compared to OFF medication (27.2 seconds) (P < 0.001). Similarly, MDT duration was significantly shorter for less (25.8 seconds) compared to more (27.6 seconds) affected limb (P < 0.001). Trial durations increased with H&Y stage (P < 0.001 for trend). MDT performance was related to MDS-UPDRS II questions for eating, dressing, and hygiene performance (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The MDT provides an objective and quantitative assessment of dexterity. The time to complete the MDT was sensitive to changes in medication state, more and less affected UE, disease severity, and important activities of daily living. The MDT has potential for utilization in precise tracking of manual dexterity over the course of PD.

通过自制电子手动灵活性测试了解帕金森病患者手部功能的特点。
背景:灵巧功能障碍是帕金森病(PD)患者报告的一种令人烦恼的症状。目前的临床评估并不能直接评估目标导向的手部功能。本项目旨在确定电子手部灵活性测试(MDT)在描述一系列帕金森病患者手部灵活性方面的能力:使用自制的手部灵活性测试客观量化帕金森病患者的手部灵活性:249 名帕金森病患者在服用和停用抗帕金森药物期间分别完成了上肢(UE)的 MDT 试验。使用线性混合模型评估了不同用药状态、受影响较多与较少的上肢和Hoehn与Yahr(H&Y)分期在MDT上的差异。此外,还评估了试验持续时间与 MDS-UPDRS II 患者饮食、穿衣和卫生生活质量(QoL)问题之间的关系:结果:用药时(26.3 秒)与停药时(27.2 秒)相比,MDT 持续时间明显缩短(P 结论:MDT 提供了一种客观、量化的患者生活质量评估方法:MDT 可对患者的灵活性进行客观、定量的评估。完成 MDT 的时间对用药状态的变化、UE 受影响的程度、疾病的严重程度以及重要的日常生活活动都很敏感。MDT 有潜力用于精确追踪帕金森病病程中的手部灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信