Evaluating the Utility of ChatGPT in Diagnosing and Managing Maxillofacial Trauma.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Evan Rothchild, Caroline Baker, Isabelle T Smith, Neil Tanna, Joseph A Ricci
{"title":"Evaluating the Utility of ChatGPT in Diagnosing and Managing Maxillofacial Trauma.","authors":"Evan Rothchild, Caroline Baker, Isabelle T Smith, Neil Tanna, Joseph A Ricci","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maxillofacial trauma is a significant concern in emergency departments (EDs) due to its high prevalence and the complexity of its management. However, many ED physicians lack specialized training and confidence in handling these cases, leading to a high rate of facial trauma referrals and increased stress on consult services. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly in large language models such as ChatGPT, have shown potential in aiding clinical decision-making. This study specifically examines the efficacy of ChatGPT in diagnosing and managing maxillofacial trauma. Ten clinical vignettes describing common facial trauma scenarios were presented to a group of plastic surgery residents from a tertiary care center and to ChatGPT. The chatbot and residents were asked to provide their diagnosis, ED management, and definitive management for each scenario. Responses were scored by attending plastic surgeons who were blinded to the response source. The study included 13 resident and ChatGPT responses. The mean total scores were similar between residents and ChatGPT (23.23 versus 22.77, P > 0.05). ChatGPT outperformed residents in diagnostic accuracy (9.85 versus 8.54, P < 0.001) but underperformed in definitive management (8.35 versus 6.35, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ED management scores between ChatGPT and the residents. ChatGPT demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing maxillofacial trauma. However, its ability to suggest appropriate ED management and definitive treatment plans was limited. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in ED settings, further advancements are necessary before it can reliably contribute to treatment planning in emergent maxillofacial clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maxillofacial trauma is a significant concern in emergency departments (EDs) due to its high prevalence and the complexity of its management. However, many ED physicians lack specialized training and confidence in handling these cases, leading to a high rate of facial trauma referrals and increased stress on consult services. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly in large language models such as ChatGPT, have shown potential in aiding clinical decision-making. This study specifically examines the efficacy of ChatGPT in diagnosing and managing maxillofacial trauma. Ten clinical vignettes describing common facial trauma scenarios were presented to a group of plastic surgery residents from a tertiary care center and to ChatGPT. The chatbot and residents were asked to provide their diagnosis, ED management, and definitive management for each scenario. Responses were scored by attending plastic surgeons who were blinded to the response source. The study included 13 resident and ChatGPT responses. The mean total scores were similar between residents and ChatGPT (23.23 versus 22.77, P > 0.05). ChatGPT outperformed residents in diagnostic accuracy (9.85 versus 8.54, P < 0.001) but underperformed in definitive management (8.35 versus 6.35, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ED management scores between ChatGPT and the residents. ChatGPT demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing maxillofacial trauma. However, its ability to suggest appropriate ED management and definitive treatment plans was limited. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in ED settings, further advancements are necessary before it can reliably contribute to treatment planning in emergent maxillofacial clinical scenarios.

评估 ChatGPT 在诊断和处理颌面部创伤中的实用性。
颌面部创伤是急诊科(ED)的一个重要问题,因为其发病率高、处理复杂。然而,许多急诊科医生缺乏处理这类病例的专业培训和信心,导致面部创伤转诊率居高不下,增加了咨询服务的压力。人工智能领域的最新进展,尤其是大型语言模型(如 ChatGPT),已显示出在辅助临床决策方面的潜力。本研究特别考察了 ChatGPT 在诊断和处理颌面部创伤方面的功效。我们向来自一家三级医疗中心的整形外科住院医师和 ChatGPT 展示了 10 个描述常见面部创伤场景的临床案例。聊天机器人和住院医师被要求针对每个场景提供诊断、急诊处理和最终处理。回答由整形外科主治医生打分,主治医生对回答来源视而不见。研究包括 13 个住院医生和 ChatGPT 的回复。住院医师和 ChatGPT 的平均总分相似(23.23 对 22.77,P > 0.05)。ChatGPT 在诊断准确性方面优于住院医师(9.85 分对 8.54 分,P < 0.001),但在确定性管理方面低于住院医师(8.35 分对 6.35 分,P < 0.001)。ChatGPT 和住院医师在急诊室管理评分方面没有明显差异。ChatGPT 在诊断颌面部创伤方面表现出很高的准确性。但是,它在建议适当的急诊室管理和最终治疗方案方面的能力有限。这些研究结果表明,虽然 ChatGPT 在急诊室环境中可以作为一种有价值的诊断工具,但要想在紧急颌面临床情况下可靠地帮助制定治疗计划,还需要进一步的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信